Active Users:211 Time:19/04/2024 03:55:14 AM
Whoa.. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM

View original post
Liandrin doesn't possess anywhere close to the strength to force the shield to bend or break so the knot is the only thing we need to hear about. You assuming that one of the Forsaken would use the exact same weave as a modern Aes Sedai is beyond silly.

I'm not in the mood for insults so I am out of this conversation.


Why do you consistently ignore that Nynaeve was shielded and called Moghedien's shield a wall? Why didn't that shield bend for her? Surely, since she's as strong as Moghedien, it should.

If you can't rebut that, have the balls to admit it. It is ridiculous that you continually ignore actual quotes.

Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2139 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1005 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1129 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 818 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1080 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 942 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1002 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1064 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 926 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 822 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 876 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 965 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 732 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 971 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 838 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 980 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 802 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 992 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1112 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1061 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1008 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 982 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 800 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1098 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 440 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1048 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1188 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 946 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1239 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1013 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1154 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 944 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1057 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1214 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 783 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 816 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 854 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 799 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 919 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 707 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 922 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 497 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 476 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 825 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 843 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 917 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 903 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 845 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 992 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 711 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 785 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 680 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 581 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 798 Views

Reply to Message