I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
"Towards the end, Jordan writes in a way that might even betray that most un-Wheel of Time quality, ironic self-awareness (‘so many fabulations drifted out that telling reality from nonsense became difficult’, 363). But no; it’s all painfully earnest; he really thinks that we will be interested in all this clothing, and furnishings, and terrible terrible sentence constructions...This is the conclusion to which I have come: Jordan is the Fantasy-writing equivalent of this Belgian man, rolling his marbles endlessly, happily round and round the same track. He’s enjoying himself. It’s not really for our benefit (although it's performed under the polite fiction that it is). It's for his own benefit, and does us no harm. Can’t we leave it at that?"
I've said it before and I'll say it again: This is RJ's world. He doesn't want you to exercise imagination to take what you want from it. He would rather tell you exactly how everything looks, behaves and interacts. I think this is where WoT-themed MUDs fall into a mire when they try to insert interactivity.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: This is RJ's world. He doesn't want you to exercise imagination to take what you want from it. He would rather tell you exactly how everything looks, behaves and interacts. I think this is where WoT-themed MUDs fall into a mire when they try to insert interactivity.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 28/05/2010 at 03:14:14 PM
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
- 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
13477 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
- 20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
2769 Views
My problem with the reviews:
- 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
3425 Views
Hear Hear !!!
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1632 Views
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1632 Views
well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
3082 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
2648 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
- 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
3062 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
- 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
2765 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
- 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
2809 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
- 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
2622 Views
My sister called me chicken once
- 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
2701 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
- 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
2706 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2637 Views
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2637 Views
On a completely unrelated note...
- 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
2567 Views
Ha!
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2537 Views
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2537 Views
My congratulations then
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2459 Views
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2459 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2672 Views
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2672 Views
There's a point to it?
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2661 Views
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2661 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
- 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
1573 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2583 Views
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2583 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
- 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
2575 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
- 24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
2624 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
- 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
2644 Views
pfft wth-ever
- 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
2454 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
2712 Views
bla bla bla
- 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
2613 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1750 Views
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1750 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
2561 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
2650 Views
I know you were, thus the
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2469 Views
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2469 Views
Unimpressed
- 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
2948 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
- 30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
2958 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
2681 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
- 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
2495 Views
Awards
- 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
2452 Views
That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
2440 Views
Re: That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
2606 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
2467 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
2518 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
2521 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
2704 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
2457 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
2372 Views
No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
2444 Views
Re: No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
2548 Views
Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
2489 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
2473 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
- 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
2704 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2411 Views
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2411 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
- 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
2427 Views
Hah!
- 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
2430 Views
Well...
- 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
2350 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
- 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
2531 Views
I suppose
- 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
2444 Views
Re: I suppose
- 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
2601 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
2429 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
2613 Views
But why only them?
- 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
2513 Views
The Shadow Rising review
- 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
2715 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
- 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
11245 Views
That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
2718 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
2464 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
- 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
2572 Views
Little late to this one as well
- 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
2600 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
- 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
2691 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2504 Views
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2504 Views
What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
2678 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
2672 Views
See my comment below
- 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
2736 Views
Re: See my comment below
- 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
3074 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
- 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
2921 Views
Speaking of irritation
- 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
2624 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
- 09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
2542 Views
Commentary, then?
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2504 Views
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2504 Views
Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
2461 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
2306 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2414 Views
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2414 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
- 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
2643 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2689 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2689 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
- 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
2555 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
- 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
2592 Views
You are very defensive over this
- 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
2375 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
- 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
2445 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
- 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
2614 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
2500 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
2366 Views
Which Invisible Man?
- 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
2561 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
- 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
2487 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2518 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2518 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
3044 Views
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
3044 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2526 Views
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2526 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
- 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
2515 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
- 12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
2822 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
- 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
2493 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
- 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
2386 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
- 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
2475 Views
Well...
- 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
2583 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
- 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
2556 Views
Yes...
- 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
2286 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
- 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
2650 Views
I guess...
- 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
2623 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
- 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
3743 Views
Nah...
- 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
2297 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
- 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
2430 Views
Ah, well...
- 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
2346 Views
Dismissive, much?
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2539 Views
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2539 Views
About that bifurcation...
- 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
2505 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
- 15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
2635 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
- 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
2499 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
- 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
2480 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
- 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
2366 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2299 Views
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2299 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind...
- 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
2514 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
- 16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
2434 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
2547 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
2485 Views
I disagree
- 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
2315 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
- 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
2637 Views
Winter's Heart
- 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
2626 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
2469 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
2611 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
- 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
2447 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
- 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
2788 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
- 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
2602 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
- 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
10096 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
- 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
2529 Views
Oh come on...
- 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
2585 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
- 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
2593 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
- 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
2596 Views
And your point is...?
- 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
2620 Views
Well...
- 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
2551 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
- 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
2731 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
1434 Views
One year later...
- 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
2421 Views
Re: One year later...
- 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
2682 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
- 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
2648 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
1476 Views
Jealous?
- 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
2446 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
- 30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
2436 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
- 30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
2469 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
- 31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
2396 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
- 01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
2538 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
1384 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
1507 Views
Yep!
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2354 Views
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2354 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
1399 Views

