To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
Larry Send a noteboard - 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM

and yet the reviewer has completely missed the soul of the series. Sure you can pick apart areas of weak writing, and a penchant for rambling that RJ had, but the reviewer has also completely missed that any one of the army of fans out there could quiet possible tell you more about the history of WOT and it's world leaders than most high school kids could tell you about the real world they live in.
And that's a good thing?

I'm not sure I'm explaining it all that well, but I find it charming that a WOT reader knows enough about this world to talk about Political alliances amongst Ajahs in the Tower, or that the women in Ebou Dar wear dresses with oval cut outs to show their marriage knife, and what the various gems in that knife represent etc... I like that we know what to expect of any given new character simply from hearing they are a Domani or a Cairheinin or from Far Madding.
I'd be careful not to confuse regulars at fansites with casual readers who tend to make up the majority of the readership of any book/series. And to be honest, I seem to recall thinking that having characters that were pretty much stereotypes was not clever, but rather an annoying character development shortcut.
There is a weight to RJs work that makes WOT feel real, a personalization he brings to each character and every town, a national and cultural identity for every person that we encounter along the way. I think all that detail makes WOT feel like a real place with real people, even when the specifics of the writing are overdone or seem to go nowhere, or could have been expedited with a few quick phrases rather than 3 chapters of descriptions.
Oh, I'll agree there's a "weight" to it, but I don't quite share your appreciation for it, unfortunately. It was an interesting tale at one point (or else I wouldn't bother commenting on it), but the weight of its narrative and structural problems lessened that enjoyment to the point that I haven't read any of the first nine novels in nearly 10 years and the last three only once each, with little desire for a re-read of any. What you highlight as positives end up being negatives for me. I guess the internet acronym of YMMV is applicable here.
I don't read WOT because I'm looking for well structured fiction, or a commentary on society. I read WOT because it's a nice little escape into a world that feels familiar and has a realness that I've not found in other fantasy... in fact WOT is the only fantasy I've read in decades.
Not to knock you for your reading preferences, but why don't you try other stories? Reading only one or a small handful of authors I would think would be very limiting on one's enjoyment of fiction.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.

Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
- 12779 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
- 2472 Views
My problem with the reviews:
20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
- 3119 Views
Hear Hear !!!
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
- 1473 Views



well I agree and disagree
20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
- 2867 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
- 2387 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
- 2796 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
- 2530 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
- 2534 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
- 2356 Views
My sister called me chicken once
10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
- 2410 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
- 2446 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
- 2373 Views

On a completely unrelated note...
24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
- 2245 Views
Ha!
24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
- 2283 Views

My congratulations then
. *NM*
24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
- 2207 Views

Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
- 2418 Views

There's a point to it?
22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
- 2404 Views

Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
- 1440 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
- 2335 Views

I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
- 2321 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
- 2366 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
- 2386 Views
pfft wth-ever
26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
- 2218 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
- 2471 Views
bla bla bla
29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
- 2340 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you
*NM*
29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
- 1614 Views

You must have low standards for entertainment
29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
- 2271 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
- 2397 Views
I know you were, thus the
at the least of my comment
29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
- 2221 Views


Unimpressed
29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
- 2667 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
- 2680 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
- 2368 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
- 2250 Views
Awards
29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
- 2214 Views
That link is out of date
29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
- 2202 Views
Re: That link is out of date
29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
- 2322 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
- 2248 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
- 2277 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
- 2262 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
- 2451 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
- 2155 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
- 2137 Views
No, no, no
30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
- 2195 Views
Re: No, no, no
30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
- 2318 Views
Still continuing, huh?
31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
- 2272 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
- 2233 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
- 2456 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him
.
29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
- 2179 Views

I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
- 2173 Views
Hah!
29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
- 2219 Views
Well...
29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
- 2116 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
- 2303 Views
I suppose
29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
- 2208 Views
Re: I suppose
30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
- 2358 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
- 2164 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
- 2327 Views
But why only them?
30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
- 2254 Views
The Shadow Rising review
02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
- 2435 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
- 11000 Views
That would be a mistake
02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
- 2451 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
- 2209 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
- 2326 Views
Little late to this one as well
10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
- 2345 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
- 2419 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
- 2257 Views

What review? I couldn't find one...
02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
- 2412 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
- 2424 Views
See my comment below
02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
- 2485 Views
Re: See my comment below
03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
- 2818 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
- 2666 Views
Speaking of irritation
02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
- 2376 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
- 2210 Views
Commentary, then?
02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
- 2254 Views

Here's the thing...
02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
- 2199 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
- 2034 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
- 2171 Views

for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
- 2378 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
- 2422 Views

since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
- 2284 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
- 2327 Views
You are very defensive over this
10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
- 2142 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
- 2183 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
- 2372 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
- 2230 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
- 2081 Views
Which Invisible Man?
09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
- 2326 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
- 2260 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
- 2251 Views

Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
- 2788 Views

Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
- 2266 Views

why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
- 2280 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
- 2594 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
- 2248 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
- 2140 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
- 2216 Views
Well...
12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
- 2315 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
- 2307 Views
Yes...
12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
- 2055 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
- 2370 Views
I guess...
13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
- 2362 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
- 3476 Views
Nah...
13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
- 2051 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
- 2145 Views
Ah, well...
13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
- 2074 Views
Dismissive, much?
13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
- 2263 Views

About that bifurcation...
14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
- 2220 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
- 2370 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
- 2264 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
- 2236 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
- 2124 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
- 2039 Views

I would love the see him review Goodkind...
16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
- 2265 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
- 2180 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
- 2315 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
- 2249 Views
I disagree
29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
- 2077 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
- 2384 Views
Winter's Heart
21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
- 2362 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
- 2222 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
- 2362 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
- 2225 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
- 2551 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
- 2325 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
- 9779 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
- 2252 Views
Oh come on...
26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
- 2344 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
- 2326 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
- 2339 Views
And your point is...?
27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
- 2346 Views
Well...
27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
- 2321 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
- 2483 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
- 1301 Views
One year later...
27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
- 2173 Views
Re: One year later...
28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
- 2419 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
- 2422 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
- 1347 Views
Jealous?
30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
- 2182 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
- 2203 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
- 2236 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
- 2162 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
- 2300 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
- 1262 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
- 1391 Views
Yep!
30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
- 2124 Views

He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
- 1273 Views