Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
Etzel Send a noteboard - 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
I had forgotten just how tedious that extended scene with the circus was until I read that description of his. The bits about the sexual explosion was amusing, considering the typical complaints about the fetishes on display and the clothing descriptions. Not much else to the commentary, though. I suspect the pacing has become numbing to him.
Which I personally find pretty laughable concerning TFoH, and it's in my view easily refuted, if one actually reads the book.
Maybe this Adam Roberts is indeed just an arrogant idiot as others pointed out, but certainly not someone who seriously wants to review the WoT. *shrug*
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
- 10376 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
- 1518 Views
My problem with the reviews:
20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
- 2101 Views
Hear Hear !!!
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
- 962 Views



well I agree and disagree
20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
- 1923 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
- 1440 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
- 1813 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
- 1608 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
- 1637 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
- 1399 Views
My sister called me chicken once
10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
- 1413 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
- 1520 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
- 1457 Views

On a completely unrelated note...
24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
- 1255 Views
Ha!
24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
- 1381 Views

My congratulations then
. *NM*
24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
- 1275 Views

Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
- 1469 Views

There's a point to it?
22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
- 1459 Views

Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
- 935 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
- 1353 Views

I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
- 1362 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
- 1378 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
- 1457 Views
pfft wth-ever
26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
- 1273 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
- 1517 Views
bla bla bla
29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
- 1357 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you
*NM*
29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
- 1134 Views

You must have low standards for entertainment
29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
- 1352 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
- 1446 Views
I know you were, thus the
at the least of my comment
29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
- 1322 Views


Unimpressed
29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
- 1694 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
- 1750 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
- 1442 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
- 1331 Views
Awards
29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
- 1313 Views
That link is out of date
29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
- 1290 Views
Re: That link is out of date
29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
- 1427 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
- 1342 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
- 1386 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
- 1374 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
- 1426 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
- 1255 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
- 1261 Views
No, no, no
30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
- 1322 Views
Re: No, no, no
30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
- 1380 Views
Still continuing, huh?
31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
- 1367 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
- 1285 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
- 1501 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him
.
29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
- 1318 Views

I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
- 1280 Views
Hah!
29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
- 1289 Views
Well...
29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
- 1269 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
- 1360 Views
I suppose
29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
- 1281 Views
Re: I suppose
30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
- 1436 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
- 1203 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
- 1333 Views
But why only them?
30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
- 1345 Views
The Shadow Rising review
02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
- 1486 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
- 10092 Views
That would be a mistake
02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
- 1549 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
- 1293 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
- 1406 Views
Little late to this one as well
10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
- 1450 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
- 1507 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
- 1331 Views

What review? I couldn't find one...
02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
- 1540 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
- 1505 Views
See my comment below
02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
- 1495 Views
Re: See my comment below
03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
- 1929 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
- 1730 Views
Speaking of irritation
02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
- 1497 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
- 1327 Views
Commentary, then?
02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
- 1317 Views

Here's the thing...
02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
- 1332 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
- 1205 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
- 1297 Views

for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
- 1449 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
- 1487 Views

since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
- 1353 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
- 1421 Views
You are very defensive over this
10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
- 1199 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
- 1286 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
- 1402 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
- 1322 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
- 1194 Views
Which Invisible Man?
09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
- 1397 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
- 1332 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
- 1352 Views

Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
- 1847 Views

Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
- 1268 Views

why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
- 1392 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
- 1631 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
- 1305 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
- 1229 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
- 1217 Views
Well...
12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
- 1408 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
- 1391 Views
Yes...
12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
- 1170 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
- 1393 Views
I guess...
13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
- 1431 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
- 2576 Views
Nah...
13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
- 1180 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
- 1235 Views
Ah, well...
13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
- 1205 Views
Dismissive, much?
13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
- 1346 Views

About that bifurcation...
14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
- 1325 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
- 1413 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
- 1312 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
- 1312 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
- 1226 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
- 1135 Views

I would love the see him review Goodkind...
16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
- 1314 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
- 1249 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
- 1396 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
- 1311 Views
I disagree
29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
- 1158 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
- 1378 Views
Winter's Heart
21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
- 1383 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
- 1274 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
- 1462 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
- 1369 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
- 1592 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
- 1367 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
- 8781 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
- 1326 Views
Oh come on...
26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
- 1433 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
- 1442 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
- 1401 Views
And your point is...?
27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
- 1479 Views
Well...
27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
- 1418 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
- 1560 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
- 787 Views
One year later...
27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
- 1317 Views
Re: One year later...
28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
- 1229 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
- 1539 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
- 882 Views
Jealous?
30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
- 1286 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
- 1263 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
- 1315 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
- 1251 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
- 1435 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
- 798 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
- 837 Views
Yep!
30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
- 1225 Views

He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
- 793 Views