Active Users:135 Time:09/04/2020 11:02:21 AM
Well... Etzel Send a noteboard - 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
I think even a first time reader of the WoT should realize that "the damn point of all this" is basically that Rand & his friends unite the Westlands and prepare humankind (and themselves) for the Last Battle against the plottings of the Shadow or other factions.

In TFoH Rand leads his new army out of the Waste, defeats most of the Shaido, wins two of the main countries, namely Cairhien and Caemlyn (by killing a major villian Rahvin). Personally Rand becomes a more capable channeler through Asmo's teachings, starts to regularily hear LTT's voice (madness?) and learns the ways of the Aiel, especially through Aviendha (they also fall in love in this book with each other).

Besides that on top of my head, most notably: Moiraine and Lanfear "kill" each other. Bashere joins Rand's side. Egwene learns to become an Aiel Dreamwalker and falls in love with Gawyn. Rand announces to create an army of male channelers. Asmo is killed. Mat becomes more and more a general and builds the Band of the Red Hand. The Wondergirls, hunted by Elaida, are responsible for a war between the Prophet Masema and the Whitecloaks (Galad is with them), capture Moghedien, ally with Birgitte and find the Rebel AS. Siuan, Min, Logain, Bryne, etc. join with the Rebel AS as well. Fain gets his dagger back and corrupts Elaida a bit. Morgase & Co. flee from Caemlyn.

Sure, not everything is resolved, because this isn't the last book in the series, but a book in the middle of the series. There are new things and characters introduced. However, IMO there is definitely a lot of progress - besides the circus episode - regarding the development of the characters and the overall plot.
Reply to message
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM 10072 Views
A question for Larry - 19/03/2010 09:40:37 PM 2118 Views
Roberto BolaƱo - 19/03/2010 11:09:57 PM 1875 Views
I completely agree with his review. - 19/03/2010 11:11:17 PM 2056 Views
Ouch! Somebody pull that guy off RJ! *NM* - 20/03/2010 03:47:07 AM 930 Views
Can't say that I really disagree. - 20/03/2010 05:19:26 AM 1428 Views
My problem with the reviews: - 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM 1975 Views
Hear Hear !!! ....................... = ........................ *NM* - 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM 899 Views
I agree - 20/03/2010 11:19:29 AM 1509 Views
You know what else I'm finding annoying? - 07/04/2010 07:29:37 AM 1448 Views
Fully Agree *NM* - 21/06/2010 12:41:05 AM 786 Views
well I agree and disagree - 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM 1799 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree - 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM 1336 Views
I'd say just The Eye of the World - 20/03/2010 05:26:19 PM 1330 Views
Indeed - 21/03/2010 12:34:19 AM 1344 Views
These reviews are pathetic - 20/03/2010 12:52:22 PM 1329 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses - 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM 1681 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/03/2010 10:48:14 PM 889 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ? - 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM 1501 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes - 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM 1538 Views
I considered doing so - 21/03/2010 12:27:27 AM 1324 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ? - 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM 1286 Views
My sister called me chicken once - 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM 1319 Views
what's wrong runt... are you yellah? *NM* - 10/04/2010 10:40:16 AM 877 Views
NICE! *NM* - 10/04/2010 02:19:44 PM 745 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses - 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM 1411 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response - 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM 1348 Views
Re: And I'm even more amused by this response - 24/03/2010 03:03:28 AM 1213 Views
Nah, TGS was the only serious review of the series I've done - 24/03/2010 04:31:28 AM 1260 Views
On a completely unrelated note... - 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM 1139 Views
Ha! - 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM 1279 Views
My congratulations then . *NM* - 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM 1171 Views
You say it as if I had been condemned to hell! - 24/03/2010 07:13:45 AM 1088 Views
No. Well, maybe. - 24/03/2010 06:52:28 PM 1187 Views
! - 24/03/2010 06:54:34 PM 1247 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 22/03/2010 02:47:23 PM 1305 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 23/03/2010 01:53:16 PM 1313 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series - 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM 1357 Views
There's a point to it? - 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM 1352 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening? - 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM 1351 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 23/03/2010 04:54:38 PM 1277 Views
pfft wth-ever - 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM 1164 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was - 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM 1385 Views
bla bla bla - 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM 1247 Views
Usually, it's spelled "blah" - 29/03/2010 07:03:51 AM 1271 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you *NM* - 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM 1079 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment - 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM 1235 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment - 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM 1346 Views
I know you were, thus the at the least of my comment - 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM 1224 Views
Unimpressed - 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM 1586 Views
Thank you - 30/03/2010 12:35:39 AM 1160 Views
*Standing ovation for DomA* - 30/03/2010 07:36:59 AM 1360 Views
Yes. Also, Roberts is a wanker. *NM* - 05/04/2010 09:28:57 PM 904 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was - 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM 1344 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again. - 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM 1223 Views
Awards - 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM 1216 Views
That link is out of date - 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM 1183 Views
Re: That link is out of date - 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM 1314 Views
This is a battle of win/lose? - 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM 1240 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose? - 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM 1292 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense* - 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM 1267 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense* - 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM 1314 Views
The final point explains the "defense" - 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM 1151 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense" - 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM 1152 Views
No, no, no - 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM 1222 Views
Re: No, no, no - 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM 1267 Views
Still continuing, huh? - 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM 1266 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh? - 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM 1184 Views
Those were polls - 31/03/2010 08:46:07 PM 1216 Views
Re: Those were polls - 05/04/2010 03:22:13 PM 1169 Views
Does it gives him right to insult me? - 13/04/2011 02:10:32 PM 1162 Views
I wouldn't know. Was he speaking directly to you? - 14/04/2011 11:28:16 PM 1320 Views
He's now reviewed the third book - 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM 1392 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him . - 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM 1214 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that - 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM 1181 Views
Hah! - 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM 1179 Views
Well... - 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM 1171 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess. - 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM 1239 Views
I suppose - 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM 1181 Views
Re: I suppose - 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM 1336 Views
True - 30/03/2010 12:23:28 AM 1182 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue? - 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM 1085 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue? - 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM 1224 Views
But why only them? - 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM 1247 Views
Re: But why only them? - 30/03/2010 03:56:54 PM 1199 Views
Re: But why only them? - 30/03/2010 08:29:37 PM 1288 Views
I really liked a lot of the minor characters in The Great Hunt. - 30/03/2010 12:49:03 AM 1258 Views
I barely thought twice about those, to be honest - 30/03/2010 06:39:55 PM 1240 Views
I can't wait what he's going to try to do with TFoH and beyond - 28/03/2010 08:18:59 PM 1286 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 29/03/2010 09:33:43 PM 1112 Views
The Shadow Rising review - 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM 1370 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling - 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM 9977 Views
You want complaining? You got it... - 02/04/2010 06:38:09 PM 1280 Views
That would be a mistake - 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM 1447 Views
Re: That would be a mistake - 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM 1167 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter - 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM 1310 Views
Little late to this one as well - 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM 1355 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit - 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM 1399 Views
Re: I wonder if this borders on trolling - 04/04/2010 09:16:22 AM 1247 Views
What review? I couldn't find one... - 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM 1440 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one... - 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM 1409 Views
See my comment below - 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM 1397 Views
Re: See my comment below - 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM 1824 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week - 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM 1632 Views
Yes, I can probably agree with what you say here. - 08/04/2010 12:29:16 AM 1126 Views
- 08/04/2010 12:32:53 AM 1216 Views
I agree completely. *NM* - 02/04/2010 09:53:44 PM 794 Views
Speaking of irritation - 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM 1389 Views
Commentary, then? - 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM 1214 Views
Here's the thing... - 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM 1221 Views
Re: Here's the thing... - 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM 1108 Views
Re: Here's the thing... - 03/04/2010 01:34:05 AM 1135 Views
I somehow overlooked this last week, it seems - 10/04/2010 11:01:17 AM 1422 Views
Indeed - 02/04/2010 10:34:00 PM 1092 Views
Re: Commentary, then? - 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM 1179 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work - 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM 1346 Views
1400 words is long-winded? - 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM 1383 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded - 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM 1254 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit - 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM 1320 Views
You are very defensive over this - 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM 1093 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else - 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM 1174 Views
Re: Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else - 12/04/2010 05:30:53 PM 1101 Views
You sound like a Goodkind webmaster from a couple of years ago - 12/04/2010 06:58:42 PM 1181 Views
You don't come across as a devil's advocate - 30/03/2011 03:07:32 PM 1126 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts - 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM 1292 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM 1224 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM 1089 Views
Which Invisible Man? - 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM 1291 Views
Re: Which Invisible Man? - 09/04/2010 01:26:42 PM 1194 Views
I have a very different take on that book - 10/04/2010 11:17:13 AM 1182 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 09/04/2010 01:45:44 PM 1242 Views
Hrmm... - 10/04/2010 11:19:01 AM 1060 Views
Re: Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts - 12/04/2010 05:37:36 PM 1272 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner - 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM 1228 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM 1248 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM 1759 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM 1166 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts? - 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM 1292 Views
I don't understand it either - 11/04/2010 12:44:25 PM 1254 Views
right? - 11/04/2010 02:13:00 PM 1262 Views
Nah - 12/04/2010 04:13:44 AM 1056 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus - 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM 1190 Views
5 reviews without saying more than "I hate the series" - 09/04/2010 01:31:13 PM 1123 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument... - 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM 1112 Views
Well, what was really resolved here? - 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM 1121 Views
Well... - 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM 1308 Views
well exactly - 12/04/2010 05:33:11 PM 1334 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then? - 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM 1280 Views
Yes... - 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM 1072 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon? - 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM 1280 Views
I guess... - 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM 1329 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest - 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM 2479 Views
Nah... - 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM 1084 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others - 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM 1129 Views
Ah, well... - 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM 1105 Views
Dismissive, much? - 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM 1248 Views
About that bifurcation... - 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM 1219 Views
I'm rather moderate - 14/04/2010 10:11:30 AM 1130 Views
I'm just a liberation theologist at heart - 15/04/2010 01:51:16 PM 2059 Views
So, if you don't mind... - 13/04/2010 05:51:06 AM 1206 Views
That's fine with me - 13/04/2010 06:31:41 AM 1173 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS. - 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM 1192 Views
I didn't find it quite that bad, but... - 11/04/2010 08:27:52 AM 1097 Views
LoC represented a sharp drop in quality!!? - 19/05/2010 03:27:21 PM 1213 Views
And ignores everything else... - 09/04/2010 05:10:00 PM 1276 Views
Inchoatus went offline a couple of years ago - 10/04/2010 11:42:26 AM 2168 Views
This guy is going to get what he deserves... - 09/04/2010 10:26:14 PM 1184 Views
I'm waiting with bated breath for his CoT review *NM* - 10/04/2010 01:00:59 PM 879 Views
Just wanted to point out that he is not reviewing the series. - 16/04/2010 04:04:49 PM 1203 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary - 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM 1216 Views
He has reached - The Hump. - 16/04/2010 03:55:51 PM 1172 Views
Re: He has reached - The Hump. - 18/04/2010 08:08:59 AM 1381 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven! - 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM 1119 Views
Yeah, I noticed that - 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM 1038 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind... - 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM 1224 Views
Finally re-read that post - 20/04/2010 09:35:45 PM 1166 Views
The magic items are mostly irrelevant... - 21/04/2010 03:37:36 AM 1184 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn? - 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM 1287 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn? - 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM 1183 Views
I disagree - 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM 1054 Views
I agree. - 29/04/2010 09:45:29 PM 1246 Views
Took me a moment to realize with whom you were agreeing - 29/04/2010 10:19:05 PM 1132 Views
Well, I did mention the necklines get overdone... - 06/05/2010 06:17:46 PM 1476 Views
Well, there's now also the tea to comment about - 07/05/2010 11:29:03 AM 1227 Views
A bit of a stumble this week - 30/04/2010 01:53:31 PM 1285 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary - 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM 1264 Views
You'd think a Brit would like the tea... *NM* - 11/05/2010 04:05:42 PM 765 Views
Maybe he's just a contrarian? - 11/05/2010 07:55:43 PM 1109 Views
Winter's Heart - 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM 1277 Views
To be fair - 21/05/2010 01:56:49 PM 1375 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read - 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM 1169 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read - 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM 1357 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot. - 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM 1264 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote: - 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM 1448 Views
CoT, you mean (link to actual post included) - 28/05/2010 04:56:10 PM 1285 Views
Yep, I meant COT. *NM* - 28/05/2010 07:02:48 PM 749 Views
Knife of Dreams - 18/06/2010 09:07:27 AM 1186 Views
Re: Knife of Dreams - 19/06/2010 05:49:38 AM 1257 Views
Agree... - 19/06/2010 05:08:44 PM 1243 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him - 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM 1262 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake - 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM 8661 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark? - 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM 1213 Views
Oh come on... - 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM 1341 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much... - 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM 1327 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice... - 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM 1285 Views
And your point is...? - 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM 1365 Views
Well... - 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM 1304 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble - 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM 1444 Views
There is no "borderline" about it. - 28/03/2011 05:17:15 PM 1184 Views
Ridiculous - 27/06/2010 06:38:46 AM 1213 Views
I like his FAQ and his overall musings on its' popularity. - 29/06/2010 06:35:10 PM 1285 Views
One year later... - 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM 1198 Views
Re: One year later... - 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM 1125 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes. - 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM 1422 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM* - 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM 828 Views
Jealous? - 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM 1180 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM* - 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM 734 Views
Seconded. - 30/03/2011 04:04:36 PM 1085 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM* - 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM 778 Views
Yep! - 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM 1119 Views
Jeez Larry, you're starting to sound like a GRRM detractor. - 31/03/2011 03:01:38 PM 1219 Views
Nah, no detractor - 01/04/2011 03:00:41 PM 1329 Views
Could a thread be locked? - 31/03/2011 07:48:26 PM 1099 Views
Re: One year later... - 01/04/2011 02:55:02 AM 1377 Views
Yep - 01/04/2011 02:57:52 PM 1264 Views

Reply to Message