Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
Larry Send a noteboard - 30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
You both know you will never accomplish 1/10th what he has. You will never be remotely as successful as he. You will never be remembered as he will. All for what, in your arrogence, you consider to be work that is inferior to your own. Thus you both spend incredible time and effort to try to tear his work down in doing so you hope to "educate" us poor ignorant simpletons; for is we were only smarter, if we only understood more, we would like you and your work better.
It truley is pathetic, but completely understandable.
It truley is pathetic, but completely understandable.
Umm...I teach for a living. I feel quite a bit of pride whenever a student can come off his drug-related withdrawals enough to learn and to be a better person. I wouldn't trade my career as a teacher for a writer any day of the week, so the accusation is amusing.
As for Roberts, I imagine he spends a lot more time as a literature professor in London specializing in 19th century literature than he does worrying about WoTheads like you
By the way, his reviews of WoT are up for a British Science Fiction Association award for non-fiction, if I'm not mistaken. I guess the jealousy extends to members of BSFA then?But yes, this response of yours insures at least another day that this revived thread spends on the active three-day view here, helping keep up that fading illusion that people here still have things to talk about
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
- 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
13181 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
- 20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
2612 Views
My problem with the reviews:
- 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
3256 Views
Hear Hear !!!
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1555 Views
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1555 Views
well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
2957 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
2502 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
- 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
2908 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
- 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
2628 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
- 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
2655 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
- 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
2452 Views
My sister called me chicken once
- 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
2509 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
- 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
2559 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2478 Views
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2478 Views
On a completely unrelated note...
- 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
2375 Views
Ha!
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2381 Views
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2381 Views
My congratulations then
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2313 Views
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2313 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2530 Views
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2530 Views
There's a point to it?
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2508 Views
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2508 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
- 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
1495 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2429 Views
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2429 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
- 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
2429 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
- 24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
2483 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
- 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
2493 Views
pfft wth-ever
- 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
2303 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
2563 Views
bla bla bla
- 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
2458 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1675 Views
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1675 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
2404 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
2503 Views
I know you were, thus the
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2329 Views
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2329 Views
Unimpressed
- 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
2805 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
- 30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
2805 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
2517 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
- 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
2350 Views
Awards
- 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
2309 Views
That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
2301 Views
Re: That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
2445 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
2339 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
2378 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
2363 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
2576 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
2271 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
2232 Views
No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
2295 Views
Re: No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
2404 Views
Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
2359 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
2323 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
- 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
2555 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2272 Views
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2272 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
- 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
2274 Views
Hah!
- 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
2291 Views
Well...
- 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
2202 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
- 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
2398 Views
I suppose
- 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
2304 Views
Re: I suppose
- 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
2444 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
2276 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
2460 Views
But why only them?
- 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
2363 Views
The Shadow Rising review
- 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
2546 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
- 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
11093 Views
That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
2559 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
2318 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
- 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
2426 Views
Little late to this one as well
- 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
2455 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
- 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
2544 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2361 Views
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2361 Views
What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
2512 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
2517 Views
See my comment below
- 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
2590 Views
Re: See my comment below
- 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
2910 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
- 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
2778 Views
Speaking of irritation
- 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
2483 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
- 09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
2357 Views
Commentary, then?
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2356 Views
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2356 Views
Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
2312 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
2150 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2269 Views
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2269 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
- 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
2489 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2534 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2534 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
- 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
2407 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
- 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
2433 Views
You are very defensive over this
- 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
2238 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
- 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
2291 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
- 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
2466 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
2344 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
2202 Views
Which Invisible Man?
- 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
2432 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
- 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
2362 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2364 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2364 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
2894 Views
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
2894 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2370 Views
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2370 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
- 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
2371 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
- 12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
2690 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
- 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
2355 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
- 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
2241 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
- 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
2335 Views
Well...
- 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
2458 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
- 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
2414 Views
Yes...
- 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
2151 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
- 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
2480 Views
I guess...
- 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
2462 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
- 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
3601 Views
Nah...
- 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
2161 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
- 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
2266 Views
Ah, well...
- 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
2206 Views
Dismissive, much?
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2386 Views
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2386 Views
About that bifurcation...
- 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
2355 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
- 15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
2479 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
- 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
2366 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
- 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
2328 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
- 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
2228 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2146 Views
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2146 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind...
- 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
2373 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
- 16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
2269 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
2396 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
2343 Views
I disagree
- 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
2169 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
- 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
2488 Views
Winter's Heart
- 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
2467 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
2320 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
2468 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
- 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
2315 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
- 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
2639 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
- 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
2436 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
- 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
9912 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
- 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
2374 Views
Oh come on...
- 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
2447 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
- 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
2446 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
- 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
2445 Views
And your point is...?
- 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
2457 Views
Well...
- 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
2408 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
- 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
2588 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
1356 Views
One year later...
- 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
2274 Views
Re: One year later...
- 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
2509 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
- 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
2513 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
1405 Views
Jealous?
- 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
2281 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
- 30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
2296 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
- 30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
2328 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
- 31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
2245 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
- 01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
2404 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
1314 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
1439 Views
Yep!
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2222 Views
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2222 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
1329 Views

