But I think my main problem I had with the second and third books (like I do with a lot of multi-volume work) is that I had a better understanding of the setting, but that the characterizations were very underdeveloped at those points. That and it seemed to take too long to get to certain plot points (as if that ever really changed!).
One of Jordan's arguable "big mistakes" early on was that when he realized he wanted more breathing room to tell the beginning of the story in the style he was aiming for than any single volume would let him, he took the easy way out and rather than re thinking the whole beginning of his story (for instance by being more discriminating with the episodes he really needed vs. all the ideas he had) he divided his original book 1 into a kind of trilogy, obvioulsy adding "episodes" to get full novels out of his original three acts. It does work more or less in EOTW and TDR but it's largely failing in TGH which has all the defects of an overblown Act 2. The really big mistake, though, was to create three almost identical climaxes out of what was no doubt his original big confrontation with Ishamael that brought things back to the first prologue. And while he was at it, why not triple Egwene's captivity as well and why not triple the revelation of Rand as Dragon Reborn? And so instead of Egwene being captured in act 2, we got Egwene getting captured in act 2 thrice, and we got Rand losing Moiraine thrice and son on etc. That's all coherent enough with Jordan's concept of the Pattern repeating itself in great and small ways, but there are ideas like this that gain from staying in the background and not infect the storytelling itself too much....
Jordan ended up with not one "slower" introductory book that you'd expect in a multi-volume effort, but three. That's at least one too much. It's only with book 4 he started getting into the thick of things and turned to the more historical style he was aiming for since day 1 (so he's claimed anyway).
That's the problem with books 1,2,3 Roberts skirted around a lot and, not having done much research on the series's history, never quite nailed down. Jordan had too much to tell in a single book, but solved this out by splitting it in three books that he then padded - and it shows.
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
- 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
13687 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
- 20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
2892 Views
My problem with the reviews:
- 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
3593 Views
Hear Hear !!!
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1698 Views
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1698 Views
well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
3206 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
2757 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
- 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
3219 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
- 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
2930 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
- 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
2941 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
- 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
2797 Views
My sister called me chicken once
- 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
2817 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
- 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
2828 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2768 Views
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2768 Views
On a completely unrelated note...
- 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
2681 Views
Ha!
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2650 Views
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2650 Views
My congratulations then
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2576 Views
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2576 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2801 Views
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2801 Views
There's a point to it?
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2778 Views
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2778 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
- 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
1644 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2704 Views
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2704 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
- 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
2697 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
- 24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
2741 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
- 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
2793 Views
pfft wth-ever
- 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
2577 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
2819 Views
bla bla bla
- 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
2732 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1812 Views
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1812 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
2673 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
2765 Views
I know you were, thus the
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2585 Views
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2585 Views
Unimpressed
- 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
3088 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
- 30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
3084 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
2799 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
- 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
2608 Views
Awards
- 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
2575 Views
That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
2554 Views
Re: That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
2764 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
2606 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
2625 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
2663 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
2830 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
2566 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
2507 Views
No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
2550 Views
Re: No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
2657 Views
Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
2620 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
2613 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
- 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
2829 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2540 Views
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2540 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
- 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
2559 Views
Hah!
- 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
2544 Views
Well...
- 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
2469 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
- 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
2638 Views
I suppose
- 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
2559 Views
Re: I suppose
- 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
2730 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
2549 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
2760 Views
But why only them?
- 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
2627 Views
The Shadow Rising review
- 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
2860 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
- 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
11369 Views
That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
2841 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
2584 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
- 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
2688 Views
Little late to this one as well
- 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
2741 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
- 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
2810 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2632 Views
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2632 Views
What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
2788 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
2794 Views
See my comment below
- 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
2862 Views
Re: See my comment below
- 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
3196 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
- 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
3043 Views
Speaking of irritation
- 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
2754 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
- 09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
2658 Views
Commentary, then?
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2645 Views
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2645 Views
Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
2582 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
2447 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2524 Views
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2524 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
- 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
2762 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2807 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2807 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
- 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
2686 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
- 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
2708 Views
You are very defensive over this
- 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
2502 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
- 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
2564 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
- 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
2730 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
2612 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
2519 Views
Which Invisible Man?
- 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
2683 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
- 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
2607 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2629 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2629 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
3173 Views
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
3173 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2650 Views
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2650 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
- 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
2655 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
- 12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
2967 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
- 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
2627 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
- 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
2529 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
- 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
2598 Views
Well...
- 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
2707 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
- 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
2667 Views
Yes...
- 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
2417 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
- 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
2764 Views
I guess...
- 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
2747 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
- 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
3867 Views
Nah...
- 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
2412 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
- 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
2573 Views
Ah, well...
- 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
2458 Views
Dismissive, much?
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2668 Views
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2668 Views
About that bifurcation...
- 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
2638 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
- 15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
2760 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
- 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
2626 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
- 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
2596 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
- 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
2487 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2405 Views
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2405 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind...
- 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
2624 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
- 16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
2559 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
2675 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
2592 Views
I disagree
- 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
2419 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
- 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
2743 Views
Winter's Heart
- 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
2759 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
2593 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
2737 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
- 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
2574 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
- 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
2905 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
- 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
2720 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
- 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
10206 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
- 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
2653 Views
Oh come on...
- 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
2686 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
- 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
2699 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
- 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
2717 Views
And your point is...?
- 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
2732 Views
Well...
- 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
2664 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
- 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
2838 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
1511 Views
One year later...
- 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
2519 Views
Re: One year later...
- 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
2799 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
- 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
2755 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
1548 Views
Jealous?
- 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
2560 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
- 30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
2552 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
- 30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
2601 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
- 31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
2507 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
- 01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
2661 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
1452 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
1578 Views
Yep!
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2473 Views
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2473 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
1477 Views

