Hmm Perhaps you confused #3 & #4
However, you are incorrect. The reason for my "defense" is simple. You were wrong. You made the statement
"Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than
RJ ever was"
presenting an argument against nigelgoboom's disagreement with what you call a review and I call an infantile diatribe. I am just waiting for you to admit that AR does not have a literary career that eclipses the accomplishments of RJ in any measuarble way (awards nominated for, awards recieved, books sold, Inspiration of future writers, anything). He is a college professor, who wrote a few novels, and criticises (in my opinion more succerssful authors); nothing more. His opinion is no more valid than yours, mine, or my friends 1 year old daughter that does not like peas.
However, you are incorrect. The reason for my "defense" is simple. You were wrong. You made the statement
"Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than
RJ ever was"
presenting an argument against nigelgoboom's disagreement with what you call a review and I call an infantile diatribe. I am just waiting for you to admit that AR does not have a literary career that eclipses the accomplishments of RJ in any measuarble way (awards nominated for, awards recieved, books sold, Inspiration of future writers, anything). He is a college professor, who wrote a few novels, and criticises (in my opinion more succerssful authors); nothing more. His opinion is no more valid than yours, mine, or my friends 1 year old daughter that does not like peas.
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
- 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
13717 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
- 20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
2910 Views
My problem with the reviews:
- 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
3614 Views
Hear Hear !!!
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1709 Views
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1709 Views
well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
3224 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
2774 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
- 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
3242 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
- 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
2949 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
- 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
2960 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
- 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
2816 Views
My sister called me chicken once
- 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
2830 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
- 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
2839 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2784 Views
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2784 Views
On a completely unrelated note...
- 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
2697 Views
Ha!
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2662 Views
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2662 Views
My congratulations then
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2593 Views
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2593 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2813 Views
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2813 Views
There's a point to it?
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2796 Views
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2796 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
- 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
1653 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2718 Views
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2718 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
- 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
2724 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
- 24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
2755 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
- 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
2810 Views
pfft wth-ever
- 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
2602 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
2835 Views
bla bla bla
- 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
2751 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1821 Views
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1821 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
2685 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
2774 Views
I know you were, thus the
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2598 Views
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2598 Views
Unimpressed
- 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
3104 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
- 30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
3103 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
2819 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
- 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
2624 Views
Awards
- 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
2595 Views
That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
2567 Views
Re: That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
2786 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
2624 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
2636 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
2684 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
2845 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
2582 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
2526 Views
No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
2568 Views
Re: No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
2668 Views
Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
2638 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
2633 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
- 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
2849 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2556 Views
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2556 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
- 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
2573 Views
Hah!
- 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
2560 Views
Well...
- 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
2486 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
- 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
2654 Views
I suppose
- 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
2575 Views
Re: I suppose
- 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
2742 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
2568 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
2776 Views
But why only them?
- 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
2648 Views
The Shadow Rising review
- 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
2872 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
- 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
11390 Views
That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
2859 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
2597 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
- 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
2703 Views
Little late to this one as well
- 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
2759 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
- 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
2823 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2647 Views
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2647 Views
What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
2802 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
2809 Views
See my comment below
- 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
2875 Views
Re: See my comment below
- 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
3215 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
- 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
3066 Views
Speaking of irritation
- 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
2767 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
- 09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
2677 Views
Commentary, then?
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2657 Views
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2657 Views
Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
2594 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
2463 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2541 Views
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2541 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
- 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
2778 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2819 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2819 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
- 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
2702 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
- 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
2723 Views
You are very defensive over this
- 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
2520 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
- 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
2578 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
- 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
2744 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
2632 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
2541 Views
Which Invisible Man?
- 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
2696 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
- 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
2630 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2645 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2645 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
3189 Views
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
3189 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2669 Views
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2669 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
- 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
2670 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
- 12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
2976 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
- 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
2640 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
- 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
2541 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
- 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
2612 Views
Well...
- 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
2727 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
- 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
2686 Views
Yes...
- 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
2437 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
- 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
2778 Views
I guess...
- 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
2765 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
- 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
3881 Views
Nah...
- 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
2428 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
- 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
2586 Views
Ah, well...
- 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
2480 Views
Dismissive, much?
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2695 Views
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2695 Views
About that bifurcation...
- 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
2661 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
- 15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
2780 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
- 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
2638 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
- 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
2613 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
- 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
2503 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2421 Views
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2421 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind...
- 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
2637 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
- 16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
2578 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
2691 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
2610 Views
I disagree
- 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
2435 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
- 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
2761 Views
Winter's Heart
- 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
2777 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
2606 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
2753 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
- 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
2591 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
- 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
2921 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
- 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
2734 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
- 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
10224 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
- 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
2679 Views
Oh come on...
- 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
2705 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
- 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
2721 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
- 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
2735 Views
And your point is...?
- 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
2748 Views
Well...
- 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
2683 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
- 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
2853 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
1522 Views
One year later...
- 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
2540 Views
Re: One year later...
- 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
2813 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
- 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
2772 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
1561 Views
Jealous?
- 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
2576 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
- 30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
2567 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
- 30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
2622 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
- 31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
2520 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
- 01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
2677 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
1463 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
1589 Views
Yep!
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2489 Views
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2489 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
1485 Views

