This is what I find irritating from his blog...
In short, he's saying that...
1. He's the first imbecile in the history of Wheel of Time readership who doesn't know what TSR was about. I can't conceive of a more direct and self-explanatory plot.
2. He skimmed something then wrote a review on it. Classy.
Obviously we're dealing with severe mental retardation here. The fact that anyone has to read the pigeon-egg sentence twice is amusing and pitiful.
Once again - limited brain capacity. It's like his world will end if he can't remember all the items in the series. Maybe they can find an artifact, and use it, then move on and find more. No, too complex I'm guessing.
Oh I do hope that every concept in this author's books are totally original. I would very much like to jump on his first character and make any number of parallels from the hundreds of fantasy beings written over the years.
Congratulations. You've displayed almost a mirror image opinion of what most fans have of the books. By the end of the series, we'll all have a good idea of what we're dealing with.
Yes, because RJ inserting a museum with roped pillars to keep people away from displays is an obvious rape of Tolkein's work.
I read the book fairly rapidly, but I look back on it now trying to remember what all this diverse running-around, collecting, fighting and so on amounted to. To be precise: I look back trying and failing to remember.
In short, he's saying that...
1. He's the first imbecile in the history of Wheel of Time readership who doesn't know what TSR was about. I can't conceive of a more direct and self-explanatory plot.
2. He skimmed something then wrote a review on it. Classy.
Now some of this, I’ll confess, had to do with the rapidity of my reading of the book. Encountering the phrase ‘the fork bearded fellow with a ruby the size of a piegon’s egg in his ear’ [227] I clocked the fork, egg and ear-insertion and thought ‘say what?’ But in such cases I can always re-read to get a clearer sense of what the writer is on about.
Obviously we're dealing with severe mental retardation here. The fact that anyone has to read the pigeon-egg sentence twice is amusing and pitiful.
Mat goes into dreamtime for a bit and comes back with some more magical artefacts (a magical spear and a protective medallion). If the novels continue accumulating magical artefacts at this rate, the three pals will be able to open an extensive antique shop at the end of it all.
Once again - limited brain capacity. It's like his world will end if he can't remember all the items in the series. Maybe they can find an artifact, and use it, then move on and find more. No, too complex I'm guessing.
A fair bit has to do with the ‘Aiel’, a sort of Native-American/ Samurai/Fremen warrior race of people who live in the ‘Aiel Wastes’ and have some special spoken-by-prophesy relationship to the Dragon Reborn. But aside from taking us around their world and culture, and establishing to their satisfaction that Rand is indeed the Muad-Dib, sorry, the Dragon, I’m not sure what the force of this lengthy narrative detour was.
Oh I do hope that every concept in this author's books are totally original. I would very much like to jump on his first character and make any number of parallels from the hundreds of fantasy beings written over the years.
I enjoyed reading vol. 1; didn’t enjoy 2 at all; quite (despite myself) enjoyed 3. 4 was pure slog.
Congratulations. You've displayed almost a mirror image opinion of what most fans have of the books. By the end of the series, we'll all have a good idea of what we're dealing with.
Can you imagine a room like that in Middle Earth? As the Old English proverb has it: better a dinner of herbs where authenticity is, than a stalled ox and a National Trust Property thereby.
Yes, because RJ inserting a museum with roped pillars to keep people away from displays is an obvious rape of Tolkein's work.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
This message last edited by Sidious on 02/04/2010 at 10:52:02 PM
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
- 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
13152 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
- 20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
2589 Views
My problem with the reviews:
- 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
3247 Views
Hear Hear !!!
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1533 Views
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1533 Views
well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
2950 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
2488 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
- 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
2900 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
- 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
2615 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
- 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
2637 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
- 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
2442 Views
My sister called me chicken once
- 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
2494 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
- 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
2548 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2465 Views
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2465 Views
On a completely unrelated note...
- 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
2356 Views
Ha!
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2370 Views
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2370 Views
My congratulations then
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2303 Views
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2303 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2520 Views
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2520 Views
There's a point to it?
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2496 Views
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2496 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
- 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
1488 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2422 Views
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2422 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
- 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
2411 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
- 24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
2474 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
- 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
2479 Views
pfft wth-ever
- 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
2293 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
2554 Views
bla bla bla
- 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
2448 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1671 Views
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1671 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
2381 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
2482 Views
I know you were, thus the
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2323 Views
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2323 Views
Unimpressed
- 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
2776 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
- 30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
2782 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
2493 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
- 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
2342 Views
Awards
- 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
2302 Views
That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
2292 Views
Re: That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
2432 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
2334 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
2369 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
2355 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
2568 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
2262 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
2224 Views
No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
2285 Views
Re: No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
2398 Views
Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
2354 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
2312 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
- 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
2543 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2268 Views
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2268 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
- 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
2265 Views
Hah!
- 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
2286 Views
Well...
- 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
2195 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
- 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
2389 Views
I suppose
- 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
2295 Views
Re: I suppose
- 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
2434 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
2268 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
2453 Views
But why only them?
- 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
2350 Views
The Shadow Rising review
- 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
2535 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
- 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
11085 Views
That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
2549 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
2311 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
- 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
2415 Views
Little late to this one as well
- 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
2445 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
- 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
2535 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2353 Views
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2353 Views
What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
2499 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
2512 Views
See my comment below
- 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
2579 Views
Re: See my comment below
- 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
2898 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
- 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
2767 Views
Speaking of irritation
- 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
2477 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
- 09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
2341 Views
Commentary, then?
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2347 Views
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2347 Views
Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
2300 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
2142 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2257 Views
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2257 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
- 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
2479 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2524 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2524 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
- 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
2397 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
- 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
2427 Views
You are very defensive over this
- 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
2227 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
- 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
2281 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
- 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
2456 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
2337 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
2195 Views
Which Invisible Man?
- 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
2424 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
- 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
2356 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2349 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2349 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
2887 Views
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
2887 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2358 Views
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2358 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
- 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
2365 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
- 12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
2684 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
- 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
2341 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
- 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
2229 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
- 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
2326 Views
Well...
- 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
2446 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
- 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
2399 Views
Yes...
- 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
2142 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
- 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
2468 Views
I guess...
- 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
2454 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
- 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
3593 Views
Nah...
- 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
2151 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
- 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
2257 Views
Ah, well...
- 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
2198 Views
Dismissive, much?
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2376 Views
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2376 Views
About that bifurcation...
- 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
2342 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
- 15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
2473 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
- 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
2358 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
- 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
2322 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
- 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
2220 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2135 Views
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2135 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind...
- 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
2363 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
- 16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
2258 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
2388 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
2336 Views
I disagree
- 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
2162 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
- 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
2480 Views
Winter's Heart
- 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
2454 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
2309 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
2458 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
- 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
2308 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
- 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
2630 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
- 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
2424 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
- 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
9902 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
- 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
2367 Views
Oh come on...
- 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
2437 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
- 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
2435 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
- 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
2438 Views
And your point is...?
- 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
2447 Views
Well...
- 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
2402 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
- 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
2582 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
1351 Views
One year later...
- 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
2262 Views
Re: One year later...
- 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
2503 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
- 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
2506 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
1397 Views
Jealous?
- 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
2272 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
- 30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
2287 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
- 30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
2318 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
- 31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
2237 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
- 01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
2397 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
1310 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
1436 Views
Yep!
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2216 Views
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2216 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
1325 Views

