Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
No, you really don't need to read it. Believe it or not I am trying very hard to enjoy the story, especially in light of the circumstances that lead me to the author. I want to like it. I really do, but so far it is garbage. This reads more like a second draft than a finished product. It is written in a form that I, generally speaking, do not like (1st person retrospective). However looking past the purely subjective viewpoint perspective it is not a plesant read. Nor, up to this point has it been very cohesive. The continuity errors ahve been rather glaring as well. This is only in the first 40 pages.
As for my sarcasm, I'm really not trying very hard to be sarcastic. Actually, I am making a bit of an effort in the opposite direction.
If I had come accross this book in any other circumstance, I would not continue reading it. This could well rival The Invisible Man for last place in my literary pantheon. I tore the pages out of that book as I read them to help preserve future generations.
As for my sarcasm, I'm really not trying very hard to be sarcastic. Actually, I am making a bit of an effort in the opposite direction.
If I had come accross this book in any other circumstance, I would not continue reading it. This could well rival The Invisible Man for last place in my literary pantheon. I tore the pages out of that book as I read them to help preserve future generations.
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
- 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
13565 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
- 20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
2808 Views
My problem with the reviews:
- 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
3488 Views
Hear Hear !!!
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1656 Views
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1656 Views
well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
3125 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
2689 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
- 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
3113 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
- 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
2816 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
- 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
2861 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
- 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
2674 Views
My sister called me chicken once
- 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
2739 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
- 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
2746 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2678 Views
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2678 Views
On a completely unrelated note...
- 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
2603 Views
Ha!
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2582 Views
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2582 Views
My congratulations then
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2501 Views
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2501 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2722 Views
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2722 Views
There's a point to it?
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2696 Views
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2696 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
- 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
1598 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2624 Views
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2624 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
- 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
2612 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
- 24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
2666 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
- 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
2694 Views
pfft wth-ever
- 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
2489 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
2748 Views
bla bla bla
- 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
2650 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1770 Views
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1770 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
2602 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
2687 Views
I know you were, thus the
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2515 Views
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2515 Views
Unimpressed
- 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
2991 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
- 30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
2997 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
2716 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
- 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
2536 Views
Awards
- 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
2499 Views
That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
2484 Views
Re: That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
2662 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
2506 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
2556 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
2567 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
2744 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
2494 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
2409 Views
No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
2481 Views
Re: No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
2580 Views
Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
2536 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
2519 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
- 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
2748 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2457 Views
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2457 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
- 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
2475 Views
Hah!
- 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
2464 Views
Well...
- 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
2388 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
- 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
2570 Views
I suppose
- 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
2478 Views
Re: I suppose
- 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
2642 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
2470 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
2664 Views
But why only them?
- 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
2557 Views
The Shadow Rising review
- 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
2757 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
- 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
11280 Views
That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
2755 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
2504 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
- 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
2615 Views
Little late to this one as well
- 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
2643 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
- 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
2725 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2540 Views
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2540 Views
What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
2718 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
2716 Views
See my comment below
- 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
2772 Views
Re: See my comment below
- 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
3119 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
- 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
2960 Views
Speaking of irritation
- 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
2674 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
- 09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
2580 Views
Commentary, then?
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2553 Views
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2553 Views
Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
2501 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
2361 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2452 Views
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2452 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
- 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
2683 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2731 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2731 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
- 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
2593 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
- 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
2632 Views
You are very defensive over this
- 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
2419 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
- 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
2482 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
- 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
2654 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
2538 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
2413 Views
Which Invisible Man?
- 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
2597 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
- 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
2535 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2560 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2560 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
3085 Views
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
3085 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2565 Views
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2565 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
- 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
2559 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
- 12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
2870 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
- 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
2536 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
- 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
2436 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
- 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
2515 Views
Well...
- 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
2623 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
- 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
2592 Views
Yes...
- 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
2322 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
- 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
2685 Views
I guess...
- 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
2668 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
- 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
3789 Views
Nah...
- 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
2335 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
- 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
2479 Views
Ah, well...
- 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
2389 Views
Dismissive, much?
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2583 Views
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2583 Views
About that bifurcation...
- 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
2544 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
- 15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
2675 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
- 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
2534 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
- 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
2512 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
- 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
2406 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2345 Views
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2345 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind...
- 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
2552 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
- 16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
2482 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
2591 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
2529 Views
I disagree
- 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
2346 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
- 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
2675 Views
Winter's Heart
- 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
2677 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
2519 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
2663 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
- 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
2488 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
- 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
2829 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
- 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
2649 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
- 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
10133 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
- 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
2570 Views
Oh come on...
- 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
2625 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
- 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
2632 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
- 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
2643 Views
And your point is...?
- 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
2653 Views
Well...
- 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
2590 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
- 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
2761 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
1462 Views
One year later...
- 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
2455 Views
Re: One year later...
- 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
2714 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
- 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
2686 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
1498 Views
Jealous?
- 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
2488 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
- 30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
2485 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
- 30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
2519 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
- 31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
2436 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
- 01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
2585 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
1409 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
1529 Views
Yep!
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2401 Views
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2401 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
1421 Views

