I had forgotten just how tedious that extended scene with the circus was until I read that description of his. The bits about the sexual explosion was amusing, considering the typical complaints about the fetishes on display and the clothing descriptions. Not much else to the commentary, though. I suspect the pacing has become numbing to him.
Which I personally find pretty laughable concerning TFoH, and it's in my view easily refuted, if one actually reads the book.
Maybe this Adam Roberts is indeed just an arrogant idiot as others pointed out, but certainly not someone who seriously wants to review the WoT. *shrug*
If I recall, so many things begun to crawl toward some vague resolution several books later, but there really wasn't a sense of resolution/closure taking place in this novel. Things began, but were there many, or any, subplots that concluded here? Not really, minus the wiping out of one villain (and beginning yet another subplot that's still laboriously being worked out). I think it is fair, if one is reading this for the first time, to wonder "what is the damn point of all this?" Unless there's something great and artistic about the circus other than providing two separate hideaways for scenes set several books apart?
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.

Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
- 13143 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
- 2578 Views
My problem with the reviews:
20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
- 3241 Views
Hear Hear !!!
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
- 1530 Views



well I agree and disagree
20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
- 2948 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
- 2485 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
- 2892 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
- 2614 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
- 2629 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
- 2442 Views
My sister called me chicken once
10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
- 2490 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
- 2545 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
- 2455 Views

On a completely unrelated note...
24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
- 2344 Views
Ha!
24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
- 2364 Views

My congratulations then
. *NM*
24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
- 2301 Views

Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
- 2514 Views

There's a point to it?
22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
- 2491 Views

Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
- 1488 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
- 2419 Views

I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
- 2408 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
- 2468 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
- 2477 Views
pfft wth-ever
26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
- 2289 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
- 2552 Views
bla bla bla
29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
- 2446 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you
*NM*
29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
- 1670 Views

You must have low standards for entertainment
29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
- 2372 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
- 2475 Views
I know you were, thus the
at the least of my comment
29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
- 2319 Views


Unimpressed
29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
- 2768 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
- 2772 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
- 2484 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
- 2337 Views
Awards
29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
- 2296 Views
That link is out of date
29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
- 2290 Views
Re: That link is out of date
29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
- 2422 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
- 2326 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
- 2365 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
- 2349 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
- 2566 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
- 2258 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
- 2219 Views
No, no, no
30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
- 2283 Views
Re: No, no, no
30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
- 2395 Views
Still continuing, huh?
31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
- 2352 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
- 2311 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
- 2542 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him
.
29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
- 2267 Views

I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
- 2259 Views
Hah!
29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
- 2285 Views
Well...
29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
- 2193 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
- 2387 Views
I suppose
29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
- 2290 Views
Re: I suppose
30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
- 2433 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
- 2261 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
- 2448 Views
But why only them?
30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
- 2346 Views
The Shadow Rising review
02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
- 2526 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
- 11081 Views
That would be a mistake
02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
- 2545 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
- 2305 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
- 2412 Views
Little late to this one as well
10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
- 2443 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
- 2530 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
- 2349 Views

What review? I couldn't find one...
02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
- 2497 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
- 2505 Views
See my comment below
02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
- 2575 Views
Re: See my comment below
03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
- 2894 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
- 2764 Views
Speaking of irritation
02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
- 2474 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
- 2337 Views
Commentary, then?
02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
- 2342 Views

Here's the thing...
02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
- 2295 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
- 2137 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
- 2252 Views

for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
- 2476 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
- 2518 Views

since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
- 2391 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
- 2426 Views
You are very defensive over this
10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
- 2225 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
- 2276 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
- 2453 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
- 2333 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
- 2190 Views
Which Invisible Man?
09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
- 2421 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
- 2353 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
- 2347 Views

Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
- 2880 Views

Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
- 2355 Views

why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
- 2359 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
- 2682 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
- 2336 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
- 2227 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
- 2320 Views
Well...
12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
- 2442 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
- 2393 Views
Yes...
12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
- 2139 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
- 2464 Views
I guess...
13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
- 2450 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
- 3587 Views
Nah...
13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
- 2146 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
- 2252 Views
Ah, well...
13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
- 2196 Views
Dismissive, much?
13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
- 2369 Views

About that bifurcation...
14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
- 2338 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
- 2470 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
- 2355 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
- 2320 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
- 2218 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
- 2131 Views

I would love the see him review Goodkind...
16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
- 2361 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
- 2255 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
- 2385 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
- 2333 Views
I disagree
29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
- 2159 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
- 2476 Views
Winter's Heart
21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
- 2450 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
- 2301 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
- 2456 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
- 2302 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
- 2628 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
- 2419 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
- 9892 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
- 2365 Views
Oh come on...
26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
- 2432 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
- 2430 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
- 2434 Views
And your point is...?
27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
- 2441 Views
Well...
27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
- 2396 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
- 2575 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
- 1348 Views
One year later...
27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
- 2259 Views
Re: One year later...
28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
- 2501 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
- 2499 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
- 1395 Views
Jealous?
30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
- 2268 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
- 2284 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
- 2314 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
- 2235 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
- 2389 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
- 1307 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
- 1435 Views
Yep!
30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
- 2212 Views

He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
- 1323 Views