Active Users:758 Time:06/11/2025 05:03:58 PM
Nah... Etzel Send a noteboard - 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
I also like to read stand-alone novels or shorter series. My point is that if the plot, the characters & the world interest me, I'm not scared of reading such a monster series, even if one has to deal with some slower parts, has to keep lots of plot-lines, characters, etc., in mind, and be rather patient for the resolutions.

On the other hand, I would argue that simply the length of a series like WoT is wearing Roberts down, especially if he normally reads shorter works with less details, perhaps has a shorter attention span and might be easily bored (as you said, he e.g. probably didn't even realize what the damn point of the plot in TFoH is). This is supported by Roberts' "reviews", which in my view become more and more sketchy, mediocre and contain mistakes, probably because he is only able to read the books very superficially. If he would devote just a bit more time to really read the books, he might eventually see some worth in WoT (and e.g. maybe even get why the 5th book is called "The Fires of Heaven"..). Of course, Roberts actually doesn't want to give WoT this chance, so his "reviews" might be mildly amusing in some parts, but overall they are pointless.
Reply to message
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM 13191 Views
A question for Larry - 19/03/2010 09:40:37 PM 3310 Views
Roberto BolaƱo - 19/03/2010 11:09:57 PM 3191 Views
I completely agree with his review. - 19/03/2010 11:11:17 PM 3266 Views
Ouch! Somebody pull that guy off RJ! *NM* - 20/03/2010 03:47:07 AM 1614 Views
Can't say that I really disagree. - 20/03/2010 05:19:26 AM 2574 Views
My problem with the reviews: - 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM 3261 Views
Hear Hear !!! ....................... = ........................ *NM* - 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM 1559 Views
I agree - 20/03/2010 11:19:29 AM 2714 Views
You know what else I'm finding annoying? - 07/04/2010 07:29:37 AM 2599 Views
Fully Agree *NM* - 21/06/2010 12:41:05 AM 1409 Views
well I agree and disagree - 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM 2960 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree - 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM 2505 Views
I'd say just The Eye of the World - 20/03/2010 05:26:19 PM 2584 Views
Indeed - 21/03/2010 12:34:19 AM 2462 Views
These reviews are pathetic - 20/03/2010 12:52:22 PM 2492 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses - 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM 2912 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/03/2010 10:48:14 PM 1752 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ? - 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM 2630 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes - 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM 2657 Views
I considered doing so - 21/03/2010 12:27:27 AM 2495 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ? - 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM 2454 Views
My sister called me chicken once - 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM 2515 Views
what's wrong runt... are you yellah? *NM* - 10/04/2010 10:40:16 AM 1491 Views
NICE! *NM* - 10/04/2010 02:19:44 PM 1353 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses - 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM 2561 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response - 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM 2481 Views
Re: And I'm even more amused by this response - 24/03/2010 03:03:28 AM 2353 Views
Nah, TGS was the only serious review of the series I've done - 24/03/2010 04:31:28 AM 2447 Views
On a completely unrelated note... - 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM 2377 Views
Ha! - 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM 2384 Views
My congratulations then . *NM* - 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM 2315 Views
You say it as if I had been condemned to hell! - 24/03/2010 07:13:45 AM 2220 Views
No. Well, maybe. - 24/03/2010 06:52:28 PM 2395 Views
! - 24/03/2010 06:54:34 PM 2402 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 22/03/2010 02:47:23 PM 2550 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 23/03/2010 01:53:16 PM 2488 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series - 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM 2532 Views
There's a point to it? - 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM 2511 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM* - 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM 1496 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you? - 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM 2432 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place - 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM 2433 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening? - 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM 2496 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 23/03/2010 04:54:38 PM 2464 Views
pfft wth-ever - 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM 2306 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was - 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM 2565 Views
bla bla bla - 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM 2461 Views
Usually, it's spelled "blah" - 29/03/2010 07:03:51 AM 2419 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you *NM* - 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM 1677 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment - 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM 2408 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment - 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM 2509 Views
I know you were, thus the at the least of my comment - 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM 2331 Views
Unimpressed - 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM 2809 Views
Thank you - 30/03/2010 12:35:39 AM 2233 Views
*Standing ovation for DomA* - 30/03/2010 07:36:59 AM 2524 Views
Yes. Also, Roberts is a wanker. *NM* - 05/04/2010 09:28:57 PM 1501 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was - 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM 2523 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again. - 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM 2352 Views
Awards - 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM 2311 Views
That link is out of date - 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM 2304 Views
Re: That link is out of date - 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM 2448 Views
This is a battle of win/lose? - 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM 2341 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose? - 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM 2381 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense* - 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM 2367 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense* - 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM 2578 Views
The final point explains the "defense" - 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM 2276 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense" - 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM 2234 Views
No, no, no - 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM 2298 Views
Re: No, no, no - 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM 2406 Views
Still continuing, huh? - 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM 2361 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh? - 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM 2326 Views
Those were polls - 31/03/2010 08:46:07 PM 2343 Views
Re: Those were polls - 05/04/2010 03:22:13 PM 2282 Views
Does it gives him right to insult me? - 13/04/2011 02:10:32 PM 2332 Views
I wouldn't know. Was he speaking directly to you? - 14/04/2011 11:28:16 PM 2442 Views
He's now reviewed the third book - 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM 2559 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him . - 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM 2274 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that - 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM 2278 Views
Hah! - 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM 2294 Views
Well... - 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM 2204 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess. - 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM 2400 Views
I suppose - 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM 2307 Views
Re: I suppose - 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM 2446 Views
True - 30/03/2010 12:23:28 AM 2291 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue? - 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM 2279 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue? - 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM 2462 Views
But why only them? - 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM 2365 Views
Re: But why only them? - 30/03/2010 03:56:54 PM 2346 Views
Re: But why only them? - 30/03/2010 08:29:37 PM 2431 Views
I really liked a lot of the minor characters in The Great Hunt. - 30/03/2010 12:49:03 AM 2321 Views
I barely thought twice about those, to be honest - 30/03/2010 06:39:55 PM 2352 Views
I can't wait what he's going to try to do with TFoH and beyond - 28/03/2010 08:18:59 PM 2440 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 29/03/2010 09:33:43 PM 2283 Views
The Shadow Rising review - 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM 2549 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling - 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM 11095 Views
You want complaining? You got it... - 02/04/2010 06:38:09 PM 2425 Views
That would be a mistake - 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM 2561 Views
Re: That would be a mistake - 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM 2321 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter - 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM 2428 Views
Little late to this one as well - 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM 2458 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit - 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM 2546 Views
Re: I wonder if this borders on trolling - 04/04/2010 09:16:22 AM 2428 Views
What review? I couldn't find one... - 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM 2516 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one... - 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM 2520 Views
See my comment below - 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM 2592 Views
Re: See my comment below - 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM 2917 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week - 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM 2780 Views
Yes, I can probably agree with what you say here. - 08/04/2010 12:29:16 AM 2238 Views
- 08/04/2010 12:32:53 AM 2388 Views
I agree completely. *NM* - 02/04/2010 09:53:44 PM 1397 Views
Speaking of irritation - 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM 2485 Views
Commentary, then? - 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM 2358 Views
Here's the thing... - 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM 2314 Views
Re: Here's the thing... - 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM 2152 Views
Re: Here's the thing... - 03/04/2010 01:34:05 AM 2213 Views
I somehow overlooked this last week, it seems - 10/04/2010 11:01:17 AM 2511 Views
Indeed - 02/04/2010 10:34:00 PM 2209 Views
Re: Commentary, then? - 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM 2271 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work - 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM 2491 Views
1400 words is long-winded? - 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM 2537 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded - 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM 2409 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit - 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM 2436 Views
You are very defensive over this - 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM 2239 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else - 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM 2295 Views
Re: Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else - 12/04/2010 05:30:53 PM 2217 Views
You sound like a Goodkind webmaster from a couple of years ago - 12/04/2010 06:58:42 PM 2306 Views
You don't come across as a devil's advocate - 30/03/2011 03:07:32 PM 2310 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts - 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM 2468 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM 2347 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM 2208 Views
Which Invisible Man? - 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM 2434 Views
Re: Which Invisible Man? - 09/04/2010 01:26:42 PM 2416 Views
I have a very different take on that book - 10/04/2010 11:17:13 AM 2306 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 09/04/2010 01:45:44 PM 2331 Views
Hrmm... - 10/04/2010 11:19:01 AM 2171 Views
Re: Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts - 12/04/2010 05:37:36 PM 2403 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner - 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM 2363 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM 2368 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM 2896 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM 2372 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts? - 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM 2373 Views
I don't understand it either - 11/04/2010 12:44:25 PM 2356 Views
right? - 11/04/2010 02:13:00 PM 2387 Views
Nah - 12/04/2010 04:13:44 AM 2204 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus - 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM 2357 Views
5 reviews without saying more than "I hate the series" - 09/04/2010 01:31:13 PM 2201 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument... - 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM 2243 Views
Well, what was really resolved here? - 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM 2337 Views
Well... - 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM 2461 Views
well exactly - 12/04/2010 05:33:11 PM 2467 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then? - 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM 2416 Views
Yes... - 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM 2154 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon? - 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM 2482 Views
I guess... - 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM 2464 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest - 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM 3605 Views
Nah... - 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM 2165 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others - 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM 2268 Views
Ah, well... - 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM 2208 Views
Dismissive, much? - 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM 2390 Views
About that bifurcation... - 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM 2358 Views
I'm rather moderate - 14/04/2010 10:11:30 AM 2253 Views
I'm just a liberation theologist at heart - 15/04/2010 01:51:16 PM 3158 Views
So, if you don't mind... - 13/04/2010 05:51:06 AM 2388 Views
That's fine with me - 13/04/2010 06:31:41 AM 2350 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS. - 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM 2368 Views
I didn't find it quite that bad, but... - 11/04/2010 08:27:52 AM 2351 Views
LoC represented a sharp drop in quality!!? - 19/05/2010 03:27:21 PM 2353 Views
And ignores everything else... - 09/04/2010 05:10:00 PM 2450 Views
Inchoatus went offline a couple of years ago - 10/04/2010 11:42:26 AM 3285 Views
This guy is going to get what he deserves... - 09/04/2010 10:26:14 PM 2320 Views
I'm waiting with bated breath for his CoT review *NM* - 10/04/2010 01:00:59 PM 1461 Views
Just wanted to point out that he is not reviewing the series. - 16/04/2010 04:04:49 PM 2263 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary - 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM 2331 Views
He has reached - The Hump. - 16/04/2010 03:55:51 PM 2280 Views
Re: He has reached - The Hump. - 18/04/2010 08:08:59 AM 2727 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven! - 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM 2230 Views
Yeah, I noticed that - 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM 2148 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind... - 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM 2375 Views
Finally re-read that post - 20/04/2010 09:35:45 PM 2356 Views
The magic items are mostly irrelevant... - 21/04/2010 03:37:36 AM 2321 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn? - 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM 2398 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn? - 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM 2345 Views
I disagree - 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM 2170 Views
I agree. - 29/04/2010 09:45:29 PM 2389 Views
Took me a moment to realize with whom you were agreeing - 29/04/2010 10:19:05 PM 2304 Views
Well, I did mention the necklines get overdone... - 06/05/2010 06:17:46 PM 2615 Views
Well, there's now also the tea to comment about - 07/05/2010 11:29:03 AM 2416 Views
A bit of a stumble this week - 30/04/2010 01:53:31 PM 2429 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary - 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM 2490 Views
You'd think a Brit would like the tea... *NM* - 11/05/2010 04:05:42 PM 1341 Views
Maybe he's just a contrarian? - 11/05/2010 07:55:43 PM 2229 Views
Winter's Heart - 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM 2468 Views
To be fair - 21/05/2010 01:56:49 PM 2574 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read - 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM 2324 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read - 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM 2472 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot. - 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM 2317 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote: - 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM 2640 Views
CoT, you mean (link to actual post included) - 28/05/2010 04:56:10 PM 2474 Views
Yep, I meant COT. *NM* - 28/05/2010 07:02:48 PM 1334 Views
Knife of Dreams - 18/06/2010 09:07:27 AM 2363 Views
Re: Knife of Dreams - 19/06/2010 05:49:38 AM 2426 Views
Agree... - 19/06/2010 05:08:44 PM 2372 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him - 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM 2437 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake - 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM 9915 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark? - 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM 2375 Views
Oh come on... - 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM 2448 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much... - 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM 2448 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice... - 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM 2447 Views
And your point is...? - 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM 2459 Views
Well... - 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM 2409 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble - 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM 2589 Views
There is no "borderline" about it. - 28/03/2011 05:17:15 PM 2270 Views
Ridiculous - 27/06/2010 06:38:46 AM 2333 Views
I like his FAQ and his overall musings on its' popularity. - 29/06/2010 06:35:10 PM 2347 Views
One year later... - 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM 2276 Views
Re: One year later... - 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM 2512 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes. - 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM 2514 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM* - 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM 1406 Views
Jealous? - 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM 2283 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM* - 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM 1316 Views
Seconded. - 30/03/2011 04:04:36 PM 2254 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM* - 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM 1441 Views
Yep! - 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM 2225 Views
Jeez Larry, you're starting to sound like a GRRM detractor. - 31/03/2011 03:01:38 PM 2406 Views
Nah, no detractor - 01/04/2011 03:00:41 PM 2405 Views
Could a thread be locked? - 31/03/2011 07:48:26 PM 2298 Views
Re: One year later... - 01/04/2011 02:55:02 AM 2672 Views
Yep - 01/04/2011 02:57:52 PM 2419 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM* - 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM 1330 Views

Reply to Message