While it is true that the books explore a lot of minutia, much of that is concerned with the decor of the setting, the clothing of the characters, etc.
I seem to remember a memorable paragraph dedicated to the unbalanced nature of Egwene's chair in her tent, and how the experiences Sitters somehow managed to keep their balance despite sitting in similar stools (or bring their own sturdier ones).
Most of the descriptions of furniture (and the clothes too) are like that. Reflecting the situation of the character, but taking too much space to do so.
I don't mind it, many others are distracted by it a lot. But, critically, I have never come across someone who likes it. No one who has said this makes the series better or more interesting.
The plot itself diverges, of course, with many secondary, even tertiary characters being given points of views. And these are what fascinate many fans (to obsessive levels), not so much because they're interesting in and of themselves, but more because of how Jordan managed to tie these disparate story elements together. Sometimes in a predictable way (where the fan is satisfied he was clever enough to see it coming), and from the left field in other cases (where many prior instances of a character's appearance can take on a newer shade of meaning).
Essentially, once you get over the pedestrian prose and the over-descriptiveness (and the obvious pacing problems, of course), this is a damned good yarn. The characters are fun, and grow enough, and are consistent enough that you don't have to periodically smack your head. The world, due to the multitude of characters from so many different walks of life, lives and breathes (allowing for easy immersion), and there is enough thematic depth that this doesn't seem like total fluff.
Had Jordan been able to control the tendency to over-describe and take care of the pacing issues in the later books, this would have been a brilliant example of "lets see how long an interesting story can I write". It still qualifies, IMO, and certainly is the reason why I think it is such a commercial success.
I seem to remember a memorable paragraph dedicated to the unbalanced nature of Egwene's chair in her tent, and how the experiences Sitters somehow managed to keep their balance despite sitting in similar stools (or bring their own sturdier ones).
Most of the descriptions of furniture (and the clothes too) are like that. Reflecting the situation of the character, but taking too much space to do so.
I don't mind it, many others are distracted by it a lot. But, critically, I have never come across someone who likes it. No one who has said this makes the series better or more interesting.
The plot itself diverges, of course, with many secondary, even tertiary characters being given points of views. And these are what fascinate many fans (to obsessive levels), not so much because they're interesting in and of themselves, but more because of how Jordan managed to tie these disparate story elements together. Sometimes in a predictable way (where the fan is satisfied he was clever enough to see it coming), and from the left field in other cases (where many prior instances of a character's appearance can take on a newer shade of meaning).
Essentially, once you get over the pedestrian prose and the over-descriptiveness (and the obvious pacing problems, of course), this is a damned good yarn. The characters are fun, and grow enough, and are consistent enough that you don't have to periodically smack your head. The world, due to the multitude of characters from so many different walks of life, lives and breathes (allowing for easy immersion), and there is enough thematic depth that this doesn't seem like total fluff.
Had Jordan been able to control the tendency to over-describe and take care of the pacing issues in the later books, this would have been a brilliant example of "lets see how long an interesting story can I write". It still qualifies, IMO, and certainly is the reason why I think it is such a commercial success.
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
- 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
13346 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
- 20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
2681 Views
My problem with the reviews:
- 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
3322 Views
Hear Hear !!!
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1589 Views
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1589 Views
well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
3013 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
2564 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
- 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
2981 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
- 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
2681 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
- 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
2723 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
- 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
2519 Views
My sister called me chicken once
- 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
2588 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
- 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
2616 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2551 Views
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2551 Views
On a completely unrelated note...
- 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
2473 Views
Ha!
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2454 Views
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2454 Views
My congratulations then
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2383 Views
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2383 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2598 Views
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2598 Views
There's a point to it?
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2586 Views
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2586 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
- 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
1533 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2493 Views
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2493 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
- 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
2492 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
- 24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
2549 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
- 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
2547 Views
pfft wth-ever
- 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
2364 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
2627 Views
bla bla bla
- 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
2524 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1705 Views
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1705 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
2468 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
2574 Views
I know you were, thus the
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2388 Views
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2388 Views
Unimpressed
- 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
2867 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
- 30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
2860 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
2593 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
- 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
2417 Views
Awards
- 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
2374 Views
That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
2356 Views
Re: That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
2522 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
2387 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
2440 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
2438 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
2621 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
2348 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
2287 Views
No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
2361 Views
Re: No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
2463 Views
Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
2409 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
2387 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
- 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
2617 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2322 Views
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2322 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
- 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
2340 Views
Hah!
- 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
2347 Views
Well...
- 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
2265 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
- 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
2457 Views
I suppose
- 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
2363 Views
Re: I suppose
- 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
2498 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
2339 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
2522 Views
But why only them?
- 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
2424 Views
The Shadow Rising review
- 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
2619 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
- 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
11158 Views
That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
2639 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
2385 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
- 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
2497 Views
Little late to this one as well
- 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
2514 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
- 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
2608 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2423 Views
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2423 Views
What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
2571 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
2585 Views
See my comment below
- 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
2654 Views
Re: See my comment below
- 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
2986 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
- 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
2847 Views
Speaking of irritation
- 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
2542 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
- 09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
2448 Views
Commentary, then?
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2422 Views
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2422 Views
Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
2370 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
2222 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2334 Views
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2334 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
- 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
2557 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2598 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2598 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
- 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
2473 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
- 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
2493 Views
You are very defensive over this
- 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
2295 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
- 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
2356 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
- 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
2526 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
2418 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
2273 Views
Which Invisible Man?
- 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
2483 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
- 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
2412 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2428 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2428 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
2956 Views
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
2956 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2428 Views
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2428 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
- 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
2424 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
- 12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
2740 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
- 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
2411 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
- 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
2306 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
- 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
2393 Views
Well...
- 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
2514 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
- 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
2490 Views
Yes...
- 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
2203 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
- 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
2550 Views
I guess...
- 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
2540 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
- 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
3656 Views
Nah...
- 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
2220 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
- 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
2340 Views
Ah, well...
- 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
2258 Views
Dismissive, much?
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2464 Views
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2464 Views
About that bifurcation...
- 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
2424 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
- 15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
2544 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
- 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
2422 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
- 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
2399 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
- 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
2276 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2213 Views
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2213 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind...
- 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
2438 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
- 16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
2332 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
2460 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
2405 Views
I disagree
- 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
2233 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
- 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
2547 Views
Winter's Heart
- 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
2531 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
2391 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
2539 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
- 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
2375 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
- 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
2706 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
- 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
2517 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
- 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
9996 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
- 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
2432 Views
Oh come on...
- 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
2502 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
- 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
2504 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
- 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
2498 Views
And your point is...?
- 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
2534 Views
Well...
- 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
2470 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
- 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
2651 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
1391 Views
One year later...
- 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
2335 Views
Re: One year later...
- 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
2575 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
- 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
2568 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
1431 Views
Jealous?
- 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
2358 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
- 30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
2357 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
- 30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
2381 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
- 31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
2303 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
- 01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
2459 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
1344 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
1469 Views
Yep!
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2284 Views
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2284 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
1356 Views

