But I think my main problem I had with the second and third books (like I do with a lot of multi-volume work) is that I had a better understanding of the setting, but that the characterizations were very underdeveloped at those points. That and it seemed to take too long to get to certain plot points (as if that ever really changed!).
One of Jordan's arguable "big mistakes" early on was that when he realized he wanted more breathing room to tell the beginning of the story in the style he was aiming for than any single volume would let him, he took the easy way out and rather than re thinking the whole beginning of his story (for instance by being more discriminating with the episodes he really needed vs. all the ideas he had) he divided his original book 1 into a kind of trilogy, obvioulsy adding "episodes" to get full novels out of his original three acts. It does work more or less in EOTW and TDR but it's largely failing in TGH which has all the defects of an overblown Act 2. The really big mistake, though, was to create three almost identical climaxes out of what was no doubt his original big confrontation with Ishamael that brought things back to the first prologue. And while he was at it, why not triple Egwene's captivity as well and why not triple the revelation of Rand as Dragon Reborn? And so instead of Egwene being captured in act 2, we got Egwene getting captured in act 2 thrice, and we got Rand losing Moiraine thrice and son on etc. That's all coherent enough with Jordan's concept of the Pattern repeating itself in great and small ways, but there are ideas like this that gain from staying in the background and not infect the storytelling itself too much....
Jordan ended up with not one "slower" introductory book that you'd expect in a multi-volume effort, but three. That's at least one too much. It's only with book 4 he started getting into the thick of things and turned to the more historical style he was aiming for since day 1 (so he's claimed anyway).
That's the problem with books 1,2,3 Roberts skirted around a lot and, not having done much research on the series's history, never quite nailed down. Jordan had too much to tell in a single book, but solved this out by splitting it in three books that he then padded - and it shows.
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
- 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
13329 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
- 20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
2671 Views
My problem with the reviews:
- 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
3309 Views
Hear Hear !!!
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1586 Views
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1586 Views
well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
3006 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
2555 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
- 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
2971 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
- 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
2671 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
- 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
2715 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
- 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
2511 Views
My sister called me chicken once
- 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
2581 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
- 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
2611 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2542 Views
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2542 Views
On a completely unrelated note...
- 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
2468 Views
Ha!
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2447 Views
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2447 Views
My congratulations then
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2380 Views
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2380 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2590 Views
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2590 Views
There's a point to it?
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2577 Views
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2577 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
- 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
1528 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2484 Views
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2484 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
- 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
2484 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
- 24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
2542 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
- 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
2539 Views
pfft wth-ever
- 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
2352 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
2620 Views
bla bla bla
- 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
2517 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1702 Views
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1702 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
2463 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
2566 Views
I know you were, thus the
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2381 Views
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2381 Views
Unimpressed
- 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
2859 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
- 30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
2851 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
2585 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
- 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
2411 Views
Awards
- 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
2365 Views
That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
2347 Views
Re: That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
2512 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
2378 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
2432 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
2423 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
2615 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
2338 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
2276 Views
No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
2356 Views
Re: No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
2457 Views
Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
2400 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
2382 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
- 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
2608 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2315 Views
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2315 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
- 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
2330 Views
Hah!
- 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
2342 Views
Well...
- 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
2257 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
- 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
2450 Views
I suppose
- 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
2353 Views
Re: I suppose
- 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
2489 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
2334 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
2515 Views
But why only them?
- 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
2417 Views
The Shadow Rising review
- 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
2614 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
- 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
11149 Views
That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
2631 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
2377 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
- 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
2491 Views
Little late to this one as well
- 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
2504 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
- 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
2603 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2417 Views
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2417 Views
What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
2564 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
2577 Views
See my comment below
- 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
2642 Views
Re: See my comment below
- 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
2974 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
- 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
2837 Views
Speaking of irritation
- 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
2535 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
- 09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
2437 Views
Commentary, then?
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2413 Views
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2413 Views
Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
2363 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
2210 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2327 Views
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2327 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
- 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
2549 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2586 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2586 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
- 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
2466 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
- 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
2487 Views
You are very defensive over this
- 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
2289 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
- 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
2350 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
- 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
2518 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
2405 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
2267 Views
Which Invisible Man?
- 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
2473 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
- 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
2406 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2413 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2413 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
2950 Views
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
2950 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2420 Views
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2420 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
- 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
2417 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
- 12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
2735 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
- 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
2407 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
- 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
2299 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
- 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
2388 Views
Well...
- 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
2508 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
- 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
2479 Views
Yes...
- 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
2194 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
- 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
2536 Views
I guess...
- 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
2532 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
- 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
3645 Views
Nah...
- 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
2216 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
- 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
2333 Views
Ah, well...
- 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
2249 Views
Dismissive, much?
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2449 Views
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2449 Views
About that bifurcation...
- 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
2414 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
- 15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
2538 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
- 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
2414 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
- 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
2393 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
- 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
2267 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2206 Views
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2206 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind...
- 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
2430 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
- 16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
2326 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
2450 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
2391 Views
I disagree
- 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
2224 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
- 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
2541 Views
Winter's Heart
- 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
2524 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
2384 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
2528 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
- 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
2366 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
- 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
2697 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
- 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
2510 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
- 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
9980 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
- 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
2425 Views
Oh come on...
- 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
2494 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
- 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
2493 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
- 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
2494 Views
And your point is...?
- 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
2525 Views
Well...
- 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
2461 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
- 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
2642 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
1389 Views
One year later...
- 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
2323 Views
Re: One year later...
- 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
2565 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
- 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
2559 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
1429 Views
Jealous?
- 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
2347 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
- 30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
2351 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
- 30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
2374 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
- 31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
2295 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
- 01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
2449 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
1342 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
1465 Views
Yep!
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2278 Views
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2278 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
1353 Views

