Hmm Perhaps you confused #3 & #4
However, you are incorrect. The reason for my "defense" is simple. You were wrong. You made the statement
"Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than
RJ ever was"
presenting an argument against nigelgoboom's disagreement with what you call a review and I call an infantile diatribe. I am just waiting for you to admit that AR does not have a literary career that eclipses the accomplishments of RJ in any measuarble way (awards nominated for, awards recieved, books sold, Inspiration of future writers, anything). He is a college professor, who wrote a few novels, and criticises (in my opinion more succerssful authors); nothing more. His opinion is no more valid than yours, mine, or my friends 1 year old daughter that does not like peas.
However, you are incorrect. The reason for my "defense" is simple. You were wrong. You made the statement
"Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than
RJ ever was"
presenting an argument against nigelgoboom's disagreement with what you call a review and I call an infantile diatribe. I am just waiting for you to admit that AR does not have a literary career that eclipses the accomplishments of RJ in any measuarble way (awards nominated for, awards recieved, books sold, Inspiration of future writers, anything). He is a college professor, who wrote a few novels, and criticises (in my opinion more succerssful authors); nothing more. His opinion is no more valid than yours, mine, or my friends 1 year old daughter that does not like peas.
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
- 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
13330 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
- 20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
2673 Views
My problem with the reviews:
- 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
3310 Views
Hear Hear !!!
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1586 Views
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1586 Views
well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
3008 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
2557 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
- 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
2973 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
- 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
2672 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
- 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
2719 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
- 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
2513 Views
My sister called me chicken once
- 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
2581 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
- 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
2612 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2542 Views
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2542 Views
On a completely unrelated note...
- 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
2470 Views
Ha!
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2448 Views
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2448 Views
My congratulations then
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2380 Views
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2380 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2592 Views
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2592 Views
There's a point to it?
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2579 Views
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2579 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
- 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
1529 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2486 Views
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2486 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
- 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
2486 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
- 24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
2543 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
- 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
2541 Views
pfft wth-ever
- 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
2353 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
2621 Views
bla bla bla
- 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
2519 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1703 Views
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1703 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
2465 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
2566 Views
I know you were, thus the
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2383 Views
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2383 Views
Unimpressed
- 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
2861 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
- 30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
2852 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
2587 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
- 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
2411 Views
Awards
- 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
2368 Views
That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
2347 Views
Re: That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
2515 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
2380 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
2435 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
2425 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
2616 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
2340 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
2280 Views
No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
2357 Views
Re: No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
2458 Views
Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
2400 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
2382 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
- 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
2611 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2316 Views
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2316 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
- 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
2331 Views
Hah!
- 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
2343 Views
Well...
- 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
2259 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
- 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
2451 Views
I suppose
- 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
2353 Views
Re: I suppose
- 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
2490 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
2335 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
2515 Views
But why only them?
- 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
2419 Views
The Shadow Rising review
- 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
2616 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
- 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
11150 Views
That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
2634 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
2377 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
- 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
2494 Views
Little late to this one as well
- 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
2507 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
- 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
2604 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2417 Views
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2417 Views
What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
2564 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
2579 Views
See my comment below
- 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
2643 Views
Re: See my comment below
- 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
2974 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
- 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
2838 Views
Speaking of irritation
- 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
2536 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
- 09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
2439 Views
Commentary, then?
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2415 Views
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2415 Views
Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
2364 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
2211 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2330 Views
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2330 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
- 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
2551 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2589 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2589 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
- 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
2466 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
- 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
2488 Views
You are very defensive over this
- 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
2291 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
- 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
2351 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
- 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
2519 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
2406 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
2268 Views
Which Invisible Man?
- 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
2473 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
- 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
2406 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2414 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2414 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
2950 Views
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
2950 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2420 Views
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2420 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
- 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
2418 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
- 12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
2736 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
- 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
2407 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
- 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
2300 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
- 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
2390 Views
Well...
- 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
2509 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
- 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
2483 Views
Yes...
- 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
2196 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
- 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
2538 Views
I guess...
- 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
2534 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
- 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
3646 Views
Nah...
- 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
2217 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
- 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
2334 Views
Ah, well...
- 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
2250 Views
Dismissive, much?
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2450 Views
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2450 Views
About that bifurcation...
- 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
2416 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
- 15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
2539 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
- 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
2416 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
- 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
2393 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
- 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
2267 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2208 Views
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2208 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind...
- 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
2430 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
- 16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
2327 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
2452 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
2392 Views
I disagree
- 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
2225 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
- 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
2542 Views
Winter's Heart
- 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
2527 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
2386 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
2529 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
- 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
2367 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
- 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
2699 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
- 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
2511 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
- 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
9982 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
- 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
2427 Views
Oh come on...
- 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
2494 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
- 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
2495 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
- 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
2495 Views
And your point is...?
- 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
2528 Views
Well...
- 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
2462 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
- 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
2644 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
1389 Views
One year later...
- 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
2327 Views
Re: One year later...
- 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
2566 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
- 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
2561 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
1429 Views
Jealous?
- 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
2350 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
- 30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
2352 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
- 30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
2374 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
- 31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
2297 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
- 01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
2452 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
1342 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
1465 Views
Yep!
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2280 Views
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2280 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
1354 Views

