Active Users:481 Time:26/04/2024 10:02:00 PM
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest Larry Send a noteboard - 12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
But when someone points out perceived flaws and doesn't praise what you praise, it's okay to roast that person without giving due consideration to what s/he has observed?

I think you missed out on the fun a few years ago of the "great clodding foot of nerdism" that another author, M. John Harrison, wrote in regards to "worldbuilding." Sometimes, less is more and more is much, much less.

No I just have no interest in a sarcasm filled pseudo-review that has not a single original criticism in it. Show me something new or a fresh take on something and I'm happy to take it seriously. Show me a foot stamping poorly thought out whine about something and I'm going to dismiss you as uninteresting.


I dunno, for a first time reader, his comments certainly have been interesting and has reminded me of certain things that vaguely troubled me years ago, particularly the comments on gender relations in the latest review. The rest is just commentary, which considering the various ways it's been used over the years, can be interpreted in several ways ;)

Or it's just a sign that he wrote MOR fantasy that most readers read as an equivalent of a popcorn flick. They don't want or care to think too much about it. Similar to how most of Terry Goodkind's readers are not supporters of his Objectivist-leaning thoughts, despite those opinions shaping several of his SoT novels.

Spending 20 years reading a series is not my idea of a fun time. Have too many books to review, short fiction to read for anthologies, and translations to be done in my spare time to spend too much time on any particular author or literary genre. But if that floats your boat, OK, but I just wouldn't think that would be SOP for most readers.

Yet note that Roberts doesn't point any of these things out in his review? Don't you find it interesting that millions of readers are out there snapping up RJs work despite it's rather obvious flaws? Shouldn't Roberts at least bother with that question? If it's such utter trash, why then have so many people spent so many years with it? No one is arguing that WoT is a great work of literary achievement, or that RJ was more than an average writer.


I said it's MOR fantasy, in my opinion. That would constitute something that would have "mass appeal" precisely because it isn't anything more or less than standard, average fare. And as such, very little MOR is going to be spectacular in anything of a "creative" nature.

IMO these books are all about simple enjoyment. Much like seeing a blockbuster film. I still don't see why you bother reading the series if you are time pressed, don't enjoy them and think they are poorly written. If you just want to see how the story ends (which btw tells me you are more vested than you let on) there are a million places to find out online.


I picked up #10 on a dare to write something sarcastic, never read the novel version of the prequel, and read #11 and #12 only because I received a review copy of the latter. I have as much vested in this series now as I do in finishing King's Dark Tower series (which I haven't bothered reading since the fifth book came out) or in Martin's SOIAF series (I've only read the first three and although I have an autographed copy of the fourth, haven't read more than a few pages of that). In other words, only when I have a compelling reason to read something, do I bother with a multi-volume work.

It is quite amusing how some think that just because one pays closer attention to how a story is constructed that s/he cannot appreciate the story being told as well. I'd argue that in several cases, the enjoyment can be heightened from being more aware of these things. I heard the audio samples and thought they were tedious. Of course, I can finish the typical book in about 2-3 hours if I decide to spend that much time on a work, so the audio parts tend to be too slow for my liking :P

Then you aren't reading enough types of fantasy, then. The books I mention in that link are very, very different from epic fantasies.

I burned out on the research parts 13 years ago, after I earned my MA in History :P

I find it amusing when writers/reviewers spend so much time working themselves up over poorly constructed sentences and minor plot lines that they lose track of the central themes of a work. Or are so focused on attempts at humor (IMO Sarcasm is difficult to pull off in writing) that they lose control of what they are writing. I'm also not a fan of reviewers that add nothing to the longer conversation. Don't re-hash the same arguments 50 other reviews have put out there and expect me to be impressed.


Then I guess you haven't read any of my reviews, then? ;)

I agree, the audiobooks aren't really floating my boat, but I thought I'd give them a shot ... I don't hate them, but I'd rather just read the book.

Do you have a Fantasy novel you would recommend?


Well, for older works, Mervyn Peake's Gormenghast novels were very good. I'll give the link to those reviews below. Then there are the five reviews of Gene Wolfe's masterpiece The Book of the New Sun series and its coda. Here's the URL for those:

http://ofblog.blogspot.com/search/label/Book%20of%20the%20New%20Sun


The amusing consequence of Roberts' reviews and the discussions here is that I'm contemplating re-reading the first 11 WoT volumes for the first time in ages (well, 10 years for the first 9). Of course, there's a poll on that, as I'm also considering re-reading Frank Herbert's Dune novels as well.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Peake reviews (first two books)
Reply to message
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM 11964 Views
A question for Larry - 19/03/2010 09:40:37 PM 2718 Views
Roberto Bolaño - 19/03/2010 11:09:57 PM 2496 Views
I completely agree with his review. - 19/03/2010 11:11:17 PM 2686 Views
Ouch! Somebody pull that guy off RJ! *NM* - 20/03/2010 03:47:07 AM 1306 Views
Can't say that I really disagree. - 20/03/2010 05:19:26 AM 1992 Views
My problem with the reviews: - 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM 2636 Views
Hear Hear !!! ....................... = ........................ *NM* - 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM 1260 Views
I agree - 20/03/2010 11:19:29 AM 2092 Views
You know what else I'm finding annoying? - 07/04/2010 07:29:37 AM 2018 Views
Fully Agree *NM* - 21/06/2010 12:41:05 AM 1137 Views
well I agree and disagree - 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM 2392 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree - 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM 1924 Views
I'd say just The Eye of the World - 20/03/2010 05:26:19 PM 1925 Views
Indeed - 21/03/2010 12:34:19 AM 1901 Views
These reviews are pathetic - 20/03/2010 12:52:22 PM 1907 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses - 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM 2313 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/03/2010 10:48:14 PM 1471 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ? - 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM 2083 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes - 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM 2085 Views
I considered doing so - 21/03/2010 12:27:27 AM 1907 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ? - 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM 1871 Views
My sister called me chicken once - 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM 1915 Views
what's wrong runt... are you yellah? *NM* - 10/04/2010 10:40:16 AM 1214 Views
NICE! *NM* - 10/04/2010 02:19:44 PM 1086 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses - 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM 1968 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response - 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM 1910 Views
Re: And I'm even more amused by this response - 24/03/2010 03:03:28 AM 1783 Views
Nah, TGS was the only serious review of the series I've done - 24/03/2010 04:31:28 AM 1854 Views
On a completely unrelated note... - 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM 1749 Views
Ha! - 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM 1820 Views
My congratulations then . *NM* - 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM 1714 Views
You say it as if I had been condemned to hell! - 24/03/2010 07:13:45 AM 1638 Views
No. Well, maybe. - 24/03/2010 06:52:28 PM 1764 Views
! - 24/03/2010 06:54:34 PM 1776 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 22/03/2010 02:47:23 PM 1935 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 23/03/2010 01:53:16 PM 1878 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series - 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM 1943 Views
There's a point to it? - 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM 1921 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM* - 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM 1231 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you? - 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM 1879 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place - 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM 1828 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening? - 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM 1910 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 23/03/2010 04:54:38 PM 1875 Views
pfft wth-ever - 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM 1725 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was - 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM 1969 Views
bla bla bla - 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM 1846 Views
Usually, it's spelled "blah" - 29/03/2010 07:03:51 AM 1805 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you *NM* - 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM 1397 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment - 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM 1777 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment - 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM 1888 Views
I know you were, thus the at the least of my comment - 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM 1746 Views
Unimpressed - 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM 2167 Views
Thank you - 30/03/2010 12:35:39 AM 1671 Views
*Standing ovation for DomA* - 30/03/2010 07:36:59 AM 1889 Views
Yes. Also, Roberts is a wanker. *NM* - 05/04/2010 09:28:57 PM 1241 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was - 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM 1885 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again. - 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM 1785 Views
Awards - 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM 1735 Views
That link is out of date - 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM 1721 Views
Re: That link is out of date - 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM 1851 Views
This is a battle of win/lose? - 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM 1757 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose? - 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM 1802 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense* - 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM 1789 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense* - 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM 1946 Views
The final point explains the "defense" - 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM 1674 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense" - 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM 1668 Views
No, no, no - 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM 1735 Views
Re: No, no, no - 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM 1832 Views
Still continuing, huh? - 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM 1784 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh? - 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM 1742 Views
Those were polls - 31/03/2010 08:46:07 PM 1756 Views
Re: Those were polls - 05/04/2010 03:22:13 PM 1733 Views
Does it gives him right to insult me? - 13/04/2011 02:10:32 PM 1745 Views
I wouldn't know. Was he speaking directly to you? - 14/04/2011 11:28:16 PM 1866 Views
He's now reviewed the third book - 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM 1982 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him . - 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM 1735 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that - 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM 1701 Views
Hah! - 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM 1751 Views
Well... - 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM 1664 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess. - 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM 1788 Views
I suppose - 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM 1713 Views
Re: I suppose - 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM 1886 Views
True - 30/03/2010 12:23:28 AM 1719 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue? - 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM 1649 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue? - 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM 1865 Views
But why only them? - 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM 1763 Views
Re: But why only them? - 30/03/2010 03:56:54 PM 1736 Views
Re: But why only them? - 30/03/2010 08:29:37 PM 1832 Views
I really liked a lot of the minor characters in The Great Hunt. - 30/03/2010 12:49:03 AM 1751 Views
I barely thought twice about those, to be honest - 30/03/2010 06:39:55 PM 1781 Views
I can't wait what he's going to try to do with TFoH and beyond - 28/03/2010 08:18:59 PM 1852 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 29/03/2010 09:33:43 PM 1664 Views
The Shadow Rising review - 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM 1956 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling - 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM 10520 Views
You want complaining? You got it... - 02/04/2010 06:38:09 PM 1843 Views
That would be a mistake - 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM 1997 Views
Re: That would be a mistake - 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM 1723 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter - 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM 1844 Views
Little late to this one as well - 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM 1881 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit - 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM 1933 Views
Re: I wonder if this borders on trolling - 04/04/2010 09:16:22 AM 1810 Views
What review? I couldn't find one... - 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM 1952 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one... - 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM 1928 Views
See my comment below - 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM 2004 Views
Re: See my comment below - 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM 2343 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week - 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM 2162 Views
Yes, I can probably agree with what you say here. - 08/04/2010 12:29:16 AM 1635 Views
- 08/04/2010 12:32:53 AM 1755 Views
I agree completely. *NM* - 02/04/2010 09:53:44 PM 1109 Views
Speaking of irritation - 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM 1932 Views
Commentary, then? - 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM 1750 Views
Here's the thing... - 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM 1743 Views
Re: Here's the thing... - 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM 1606 Views
Re: Here's the thing... - 03/04/2010 01:34:05 AM 1659 Views
I somehow overlooked this last week, it seems - 10/04/2010 11:01:17 AM 1952 Views
Indeed - 02/04/2010 10:34:00 PM 1629 Views
Re: Commentary, then? - 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM 1730 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work - 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM 1914 Views
1400 words is long-winded? - 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM 1932 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded - 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM 1798 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit - 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM 1875 Views
You are very defensive over this - 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM 1626 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else - 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM 1734 Views
Re: Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else - 12/04/2010 05:30:53 PM 1645 Views
You sound like a Goodkind webmaster from a couple of years ago - 12/04/2010 06:58:42 PM 1720 Views
You don't come across as a devil's advocate - 30/03/2011 03:07:32 PM 1724 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts - 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM 1857 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM 1734 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM 1611 Views
Which Invisible Man? - 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM 1834 Views
Re: Which Invisible Man? - 09/04/2010 01:26:42 PM 1759 Views
I have a very different take on that book - 10/04/2010 11:17:13 AM 1690 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 09/04/2010 01:45:44 PM 1745 Views
Hrmm... - 10/04/2010 11:19:01 AM 1587 Views
Re: Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts - 12/04/2010 05:37:36 PM 1829 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner - 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM 1781 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM 1793 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM 2350 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM 1769 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts? - 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM 1799 Views
I don't understand it either - 11/04/2010 12:44:25 PM 1758 Views
right? - 11/04/2010 02:13:00 PM 1803 Views
Nah - 12/04/2010 04:13:44 AM 1599 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest - 12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM 2082 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus - 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM 1735 Views
5 reviews without saying more than "I hate the series" - 09/04/2010 01:31:13 PM 1631 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument... - 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM 1664 Views
Well, what was really resolved here? - 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM 1722 Views
Well... - 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM 1836 Views
well exactly - 12/04/2010 05:33:11 PM 1877 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then? - 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM 1855 Views
Yes... - 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM 1575 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon? - 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM 1850 Views
I guess... - 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM 1868 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest - 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM 3004 Views
Nah... - 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM 1600 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others - 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM 1674 Views
Ah, well... - 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM 1631 Views
Dismissive, much? - 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM 1775 Views
About that bifurcation... - 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM 1736 Views
I'm rather moderate - 14/04/2010 10:11:30 AM 1652 Views
I'm just a liberation theologist at heart - 15/04/2010 01:51:16 PM 2576 Views
So, if you don't mind... - 13/04/2010 05:51:06 AM 1752 Views
That's fine with me - 13/04/2010 06:31:41 AM 1717 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS. - 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM 1735 Views
I didn't find it quite that bad, but... - 11/04/2010 08:27:52 AM 1755 Views
LoC represented a sharp drop in quality!!? - 19/05/2010 03:27:21 PM 1768 Views
And ignores everything else... - 09/04/2010 05:10:00 PM 1802 Views
Inchoatus went offline a couple of years ago - 10/04/2010 11:42:26 AM 2718 Views
This guy is going to get what he deserves... - 09/04/2010 10:26:14 PM 1735 Views
I'm waiting with bated breath for his CoT review *NM* - 10/04/2010 01:00:59 PM 1203 Views
Just wanted to point out that he is not reviewing the series. - 16/04/2010 04:04:49 PM 1696 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary - 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM 1719 Views
He has reached - The Hump. - 16/04/2010 03:55:51 PM 1676 Views
Re: He has reached - The Hump. - 18/04/2010 08:08:59 AM 2126 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven! - 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM 1648 Views
Yeah, I noticed that - 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM 1572 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind... - 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM 1754 Views
Finally re-read that post - 20/04/2010 09:35:45 PM 1754 Views
The magic items are mostly irrelevant... - 21/04/2010 03:37:36 AM 1749 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn? - 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM 1854 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn? - 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM 1794 Views
I disagree - 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM 1601 Views
I agree. - 29/04/2010 09:45:29 PM 1794 Views
Took me a moment to realize with whom you were agreeing - 29/04/2010 10:19:05 PM 1683 Views
Well, I did mention the necklines get overdone... - 06/05/2010 06:17:46 PM 2047 Views
Well, there's now also the tea to comment about - 07/05/2010 11:29:03 AM 1809 Views
A bit of a stumble this week - 30/04/2010 01:53:31 PM 1845 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary - 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM 1873 Views
You'd think a Brit would like the tea... *NM* - 11/05/2010 04:05:42 PM 1066 Views
Maybe he's just a contrarian? - 11/05/2010 07:55:43 PM 1657 Views
Winter's Heart - 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM 1875 Views
To be fair - 21/05/2010 01:56:49 PM 2007 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read - 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM 1722 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read - 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM 1901 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot. - 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM 1793 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote: - 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM 2050 Views
CoT, you mean (link to actual post included) - 28/05/2010 04:56:10 PM 1895 Views
Yep, I meant COT. *NM* - 28/05/2010 07:02:48 PM 1063 Views
Knife of Dreams - 18/06/2010 09:07:27 AM 1768 Views
Re: Knife of Dreams - 19/06/2010 05:49:38 AM 1836 Views
Agree... - 19/06/2010 05:08:44 PM 1803 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him - 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM 1849 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake - 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM 9254 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark? - 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM 1773 Views
Oh come on... - 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM 1856 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much... - 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM 1882 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice... - 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM 1884 Views
And your point is...? - 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM 1917 Views
Well... - 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM 1869 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble - 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM 2003 Views
There is no "borderline" about it. - 28/03/2011 05:17:15 PM 1714 Views
Ridiculous - 27/06/2010 06:38:46 AM 1756 Views
I like his FAQ and his overall musings on its' popularity. - 29/06/2010 06:35:10 PM 1819 Views
One year later... - 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM 1740 Views
Re: One year later... - 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM 1917 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes. - 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM 1945 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM* - 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM 1130 Views
Jealous? - 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM 1719 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM* - 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM 1056 Views
Seconded. - 30/03/2011 04:04:36 PM 1664 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM* - 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM 1186 Views
Yep! - 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM 1651 Views
Jeez Larry, you're starting to sound like a GRRM detractor. - 31/03/2011 03:01:38 PM 1811 Views
Nah, no detractor - 01/04/2011 03:00:41 PM 1818 Views
Could a thread be locked? - 31/03/2011 07:48:26 PM 1683 Views
Re: One year later... - 01/04/2011 02:55:02 AM 2030 Views
Yep - 01/04/2011 02:57:52 PM 1809 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM* - 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM 1066 Views

Reply to Message