So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
Larry Send a noteboard - 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
I think even a first time reader of the WoT should realize that "the damn point of all this" is basically that Rand & his friends unite the Westlands and prepare humankind (and themselves) for the Last Battle against the plottings of the Shadow or other factions.
I seem to recall (and again, my memory may be faulty after a decade of not reading the books in question) that this narrative thrust starts to become quite blunted around this point, with thousands of pages devoted to less plot advancement than was the case for the first 3-4 books.
In TFoH Rand leads his new army out of the Waste, defeats most of the Shaido, wins two of the main countries, namely Cairhien and Caemlyn (by killing a major villian Rahvin). Personally Rand becomes a more capable channeler through Asmo's teachings, starts to regularily hear LTT's voice (madness?) and learns the ways of the Aiel, especially through Aviendha (they also fall in love in this book with each other).
Oh, the zombie Shaido? How long before they were truly dispersed? Six books? And the main character just "leveled up" and that's the main 'development,' outside of the madman? Sounds more like execrable development than anything truly momentous.
Besides that on top of my head, most notably: Moiraine and Lanfear "kill" each other. Bashere joins Rand's side. Egwene learns to become an Aiel Dreamwalker and falls in love with Gawyn. Rand announces to create an army of male channelers. Asmo is killed. Mat becomes more and more a general and builds the Band of the Red Hand. The Wondergirls, hunted by Elaida, are responsible for a war between the Prophet Masema and the Whitecloaks (Galad is with them), capture Moghedien, ally with Birgitte and find the Rebel AS. Siuan, Min, Logain, Bryne, etc. join with the Rebel AS as well. Fain gets his dagger back and corrupts Elaida a bit. Morgase & Co. flee from Caemlyn.
All stuff with implications for later. What was resolved?
Sure, not everything is resolved, because this isn't the last book in the series, but a book in the middle of the series. There are new things and characters introduced. However, IMO there is definitely a lot of progress - besides the circus episode - regarding the development of the characters and the overall plot.
Very little was resolved, nor were the things you mention have much in the way of resolution for several more books. Is it any wonder that around this point that these 5-7 "middle volumes" read like Chs. 45-56 in a Dickens-length novel? Lots of verbiage and slowing progression, it seems.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
- 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
13690 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
- 20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
2894 Views
My problem with the reviews:
- 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
3597 Views
Hear Hear !!!
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1699 Views
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1699 Views
well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
3208 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
2760 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
- 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
3221 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
- 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
2933 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
- 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
2943 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
- 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
2802 Views
My sister called me chicken once
- 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
2819 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
- 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
2829 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2770 Views
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2770 Views
On a completely unrelated note...
- 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
2685 Views
Ha!
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2652 Views
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2652 Views
My congratulations then
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2578 Views
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2578 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2803 Views
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2803 Views
There's a point to it?
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2780 Views
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2780 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
- 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
1646 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2705 Views
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2705 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
- 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
2699 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
- 24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
2744 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
- 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
2795 Views
pfft wth-ever
- 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
2579 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
2821 Views
bla bla bla
- 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
2734 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1812 Views
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1812 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
2674 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
2766 Views
I know you were, thus the
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2586 Views
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2586 Views
Unimpressed
- 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
3090 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
- 30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
3086 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
2801 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
- 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
2609 Views
Awards
- 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
2577 Views
That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
2557 Views
Re: That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
2766 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
2608 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
2626 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
2666 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
2832 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
2567 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
2509 Views
No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
2551 Views
Re: No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
2659 Views
Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
2622 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
2616 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
- 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
2833 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2541 Views
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2541 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
- 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
2561 Views
Hah!
- 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
2545 Views
Well...
- 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
2472 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
- 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
2639 Views
I suppose
- 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
2563 Views
Re: I suppose
- 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
2731 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
2551 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
2762 Views
But why only them?
- 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
2631 Views
The Shadow Rising review
- 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
2863 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
- 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
11370 Views
That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
2842 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
2586 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
- 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
2689 Views
Little late to this one as well
- 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
2744 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
- 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
2811 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2635 Views
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2635 Views
What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
2790 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
2796 Views
See my comment below
- 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
2863 Views
Re: See my comment below
- 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
3199 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
- 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
3044 Views
Speaking of irritation
- 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
2756 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
- 09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
2660 Views
Commentary, then?
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2646 Views
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2646 Views
Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
2584 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
2452 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2528 Views
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2528 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
- 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
2764 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2808 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2808 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
- 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
2688 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
- 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
2710 Views
You are very defensive over this
- 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
2504 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
- 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
2566 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
- 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
2731 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
2614 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
2521 Views
Which Invisible Man?
- 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
2684 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
- 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
2611 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2631 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2631 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
3174 Views
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
3174 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2652 Views
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2652 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
- 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
2657 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
- 12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
2969 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
- 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
2629 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
- 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
2530 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
- 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
2600 Views
Well...
- 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
2712 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
- 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
2670 Views
Yes...
- 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
2420 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
- 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
2766 Views
I guess...
- 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
2749 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
- 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
3868 Views
Nah...
- 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
2414 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
- 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
2575 Views
Ah, well...
- 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
2459 Views
Dismissive, much?
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2671 Views
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2671 Views
About that bifurcation...
- 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
2639 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
- 15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
2762 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
- 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
2627 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
- 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
2600 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
- 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
2489 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2407 Views
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2407 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind...
- 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
2625 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
- 16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
2561 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
2678 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
2594 Views
I disagree
- 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
2422 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
- 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
2747 Views
Winter's Heart
- 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
2762 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
2594 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
2738 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
- 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
2575 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
- 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
2907 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
- 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
2723 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
- 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
10208 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
- 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
2658 Views
Oh come on...
- 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
2688 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
- 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
2701 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
- 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
2718 Views
And your point is...?
- 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
2733 Views
Well...
- 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
2667 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
- 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
2840 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
1513 Views
One year later...
- 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
2523 Views
Re: One year later...
- 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
2801 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
- 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
2758 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
1550 Views
Jealous?
- 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
2562 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
- 30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
2554 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
- 30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
2603 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
- 31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
2509 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
- 01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
2664 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
1453 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
1579 Views
Yep!
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2476 Views
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2476 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
1478 Views

