Active Users:1743 Time:09/10/2026 05:20:53 PM
Yes... Etzel Send a noteboard - 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
I think it's pretty normal that most resolutions come in the last part of a series, not in the middle. That doesn't mean, though, that this middle part is unimportant. The thing is simply that WoT had an exceptional scope. One can compare this e.g. with Song of Ice & Fire or The Malazan Book of the Fallen. However, it's in my view dishonest to compare WoT with other works, which were simply constructed in a shorter way, and then critizise in the middle of the series that WoT is too long or pointless, that nothing happens or is ever resolved. It's like comparing a TV series like Lost with a 2 hours fantasy movie.
Reply to message
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM 13717 Views
A question for Larry - 19/03/2010 09:40:37 PM 3599 Views
Roberto BolaƱo - 19/03/2010 11:09:57 PM 3567 Views
I completely agree with his review. - 19/03/2010 11:11:17 PM 3581 Views
Ouch! Somebody pull that guy off RJ! *NM* - 20/03/2010 03:47:07 AM 1794 Views
Can't say that I really disagree. - 20/03/2010 05:19:26 AM 2888 Views
My problem with the reviews: - 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM 3614 Views
Hear Hear !!! ....................... = ........................ *NM* - 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM 1709 Views
I agree - 20/03/2010 11:19:29 AM 2984 Views
You know what else I'm finding annoying? - 07/04/2010 07:29:37 AM 2867 Views
Fully Agree *NM* - 21/06/2010 12:41:05 AM 1571 Views
well I agree and disagree - 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM 3223 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree - 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM 2774 Views
I'd say just The Eye of the World - 20/03/2010 05:26:19 PM 2907 Views
Indeed - 21/03/2010 12:34:19 AM 2765 Views
These reviews are pathetic - 20/03/2010 12:52:22 PM 2774 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses - 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM 3240 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/03/2010 10:48:14 PM 1910 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ? - 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM 2946 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes - 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM 2959 Views
I considered doing so - 21/03/2010 12:27:27 AM 2766 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ? - 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM 2815 Views
My sister called me chicken once - 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM 2829 Views
what's wrong runt... are you yellah? *NM* - 10/04/2010 10:40:16 AM 1641 Views
NICE! *NM* - 10/04/2010 02:19:44 PM 1498 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses - 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM 2839 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response - 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM 2784 Views
Re: And I'm even more amused by this response - 24/03/2010 03:03:28 AM 2665 Views
Nah, TGS was the only serious review of the series I've done - 24/03/2010 04:31:28 AM 2738 Views
On a completely unrelated note... - 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM 2696 Views
Ha! - 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM 2662 Views
My congratulations then . *NM* - 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM 2588 Views
You say it as if I had been condemned to hell! - 24/03/2010 07:13:45 AM 2525 Views
No. Well, maybe. - 24/03/2010 06:52:28 PM 2679 Views
! - 24/03/2010 06:54:34 PM 2703 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 22/03/2010 02:47:23 PM 2858 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 23/03/2010 01:53:16 PM 2765 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series - 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM 2812 Views
There's a point to it? - 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM 2795 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM* - 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM 1653 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you? - 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM 2716 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place - 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM 2723 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening? - 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM 2810 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 23/03/2010 04:54:38 PM 2766 Views
pfft wth-ever - 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM 2600 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was - 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM 2834 Views
bla bla bla - 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM 2751 Views
Usually, it's spelled "blah" - 29/03/2010 07:03:51 AM 2685 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you *NM* - 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM 1820 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment - 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM 2685 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment - 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM 2773 Views
I know you were, thus the at the least of my comment - 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM 2597 Views
Unimpressed - 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM 3104 Views
Thank you - 30/03/2010 12:35:39 AM 2528 Views
*Standing ovation for DomA* - 30/03/2010 07:36:59 AM 2797 Views
Yes. Also, Roberts is a wanker. *NM* - 05/04/2010 09:28:57 PM 1667 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was - 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM 2819 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again. - 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM 2624 Views
Awards - 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM 2595 Views
That link is out of date - 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM 2567 Views
Re: That link is out of date - 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM 2785 Views
This is a battle of win/lose? - 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM 2624 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose? - 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM 2635 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense* - 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM 2684 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense* - 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM 2844 Views
The final point explains the "defense" - 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM 2582 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense" - 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM 2524 Views
No, no, no - 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM 2567 Views
Re: No, no, no - 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM 2668 Views
Still continuing, huh? - 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM 2637 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh? - 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM 2631 Views
Those were polls - 31/03/2010 08:46:07 PM 2629 Views
Re: Those were polls - 05/04/2010 03:22:13 PM 2536 Views
Does it gives him right to insult me? - 13/04/2011 02:10:32 PM 2611 Views
I wouldn't know. Was he speaking directly to you? - 14/04/2011 11:28:16 PM 2710 Views
He's now reviewed the third book - 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM 2847 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him . - 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM 2556 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that - 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM 2573 Views
Hah! - 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM 2557 Views
Well... - 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM 2485 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess. - 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM 2653 Views
I suppose - 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM 2574 Views
Re: I suppose - 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM 2742 Views
True - 30/03/2010 12:23:28 AM 2579 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue? - 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM 2566 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue? - 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM 2774 Views
But why only them? - 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM 2647 Views
Re: But why only them? - 30/03/2010 03:56:54 PM 2658 Views
Re: But why only them? - 30/03/2010 08:29:37 PM 2746 Views
I really liked a lot of the minor characters in The Great Hunt. - 30/03/2010 12:49:03 AM 2583 Views
I barely thought twice about those, to be honest - 30/03/2010 06:39:55 PM 2625 Views
I can't wait what he's going to try to do with TFoH and beyond - 28/03/2010 08:18:59 PM 2709 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 29/03/2010 09:33:43 PM 2546 Views
The Shadow Rising review - 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM 2871 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling - 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM 11390 Views
You want complaining? You got it... - 02/04/2010 06:38:09 PM 2696 Views
That would be a mistake - 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM 2858 Views
Re: That would be a mistake - 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM 2596 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter - 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM 2702 Views
Little late to this one as well - 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM 2759 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit - 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM 2823 Views
Re: I wonder if this borders on trolling - 04/04/2010 09:16:22 AM 2703 Views
What review? I couldn't find one... - 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM 2802 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one... - 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM 2809 Views
See my comment below - 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM 2875 Views
Re: See my comment below - 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM 3214 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week - 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM 3064 Views
Yes, I can probably agree with what you say here. - 08/04/2010 12:29:16 AM 2513 Views
- 08/04/2010 12:32:53 AM 2650 Views
I agree completely. *NM* - 02/04/2010 09:53:44 PM 1540 Views
Speaking of irritation - 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM 2767 Views
Commentary, then? - 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM 2656 Views
Here's the thing... - 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM 2594 Views
Re: Here's the thing... - 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM 2462 Views
Re: Here's the thing... - 03/04/2010 01:34:05 AM 2489 Views
I somehow overlooked this last week, it seems - 10/04/2010 11:01:17 AM 2822 Views
Indeed - 02/04/2010 10:34:00 PM 2486 Views
Re: Commentary, then? - 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM 2540 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work - 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM 2778 Views
1400 words is long-winded? - 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM 2819 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded - 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM 2701 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit - 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM 2721 Views
You are very defensive over this - 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM 2518 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else - 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM 2578 Views
Re: Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else - 12/04/2010 05:30:53 PM 2510 Views
You sound like a Goodkind webmaster from a couple of years ago - 12/04/2010 06:58:42 PM 2600 Views
You don't come across as a devil's advocate - 30/03/2011 03:07:32 PM 2621 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts - 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM 2744 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM 2631 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM 2539 Views
Which Invisible Man? - 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM 2696 Views
Re: Which Invisible Man? - 09/04/2010 01:26:42 PM 2736 Views
I have a very different take on that book - 10/04/2010 11:17:13 AM 2577 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 09/04/2010 01:45:44 PM 2639 Views
Hrmm... - 10/04/2010 11:19:01 AM 2464 Views
Re: Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts - 12/04/2010 05:37:36 PM 2698 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner - 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM 2629 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM 2645 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM 3187 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM 2669 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts? - 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM 2668 Views
I don't understand it either - 11/04/2010 12:44:25 PM 2653 Views
right? - 11/04/2010 02:13:00 PM 2670 Views
Nah - 12/04/2010 04:13:44 AM 2486 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus - 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM 2640 Views
5 reviews without saying more than "I hate the series" - 09/04/2010 01:31:13 PM 2509 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument... - 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM 2541 Views
Well, what was really resolved here? - 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM 2612 Views
Well... - 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM 2726 Views
well exactly - 12/04/2010 05:33:11 PM 2719 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then? - 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM 2683 Views
Yes... - 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM 2436 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon? - 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM 2778 Views
I guess... - 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM 2765 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest - 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM 3877 Views
Nah... - 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM 2428 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others - 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM 2586 Views
Ah, well... - 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM 2475 Views
Dismissive, much? - 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM 2692 Views
About that bifurcation... - 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM 2660 Views
I'm rather moderate - 14/04/2010 10:11:30 AM 2592 Views
I'm just a liberation theologist at heart - 15/04/2010 01:51:16 PM 3449 Views
So, if you don't mind... - 13/04/2010 05:51:06 AM 2672 Views
That's fine with me - 13/04/2010 06:31:41 AM 2622 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS. - 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM 2638 Views
I didn't find it quite that bad, but... - 11/04/2010 08:27:52 AM 2648 Views
LoC represented a sharp drop in quality!!? - 19/05/2010 03:27:21 PM 2606 Views
And ignores everything else... - 09/04/2010 05:10:00 PM 2733 Views
Inchoatus went offline a couple of years ago - 10/04/2010 11:42:26 AM 3573 Views
This guy is going to get what he deserves... - 09/04/2010 10:26:14 PM 2609 Views
I'm waiting with bated breath for his CoT review *NM* - 10/04/2010 01:00:59 PM 1633 Views
Just wanted to point out that he is not reviewing the series. - 16/04/2010 04:04:49 PM 2526 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary - 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM 2610 Views
He has reached - The Hump. - 16/04/2010 03:55:51 PM 2563 Views
Re: He has reached - The Hump. - 18/04/2010 08:08:59 AM 2984 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven! - 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM 2503 Views
Yeah, I noticed that - 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM 2421 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind... - 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM 2634 Views
Finally re-read that post - 20/04/2010 09:35:45 PM 2626 Views
The magic items are mostly irrelevant... - 21/04/2010 03:37:36 AM 2596 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn? - 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM 2691 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn? - 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM 2610 Views
I disagree - 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM 2435 Views
I agree. - 29/04/2010 09:45:29 PM 2648 Views
Took me a moment to realize with whom you were agreeing - 29/04/2010 10:19:05 PM 2581 Views
Well, I did mention the necklines get overdone... - 06/05/2010 06:17:46 PM 2895 Views
Well, there's now also the tea to comment about - 07/05/2010 11:29:03 AM 2687 Views
A bit of a stumble this week - 30/04/2010 01:53:31 PM 2704 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary - 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM 2759 Views
You'd think a Brit would like the tea... *NM* - 11/05/2010 04:05:42 PM 1480 Views
Maybe he's just a contrarian? - 11/05/2010 07:55:43 PM 2506 Views
Winter's Heart - 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM 2777 Views
To be fair - 21/05/2010 01:56:49 PM 2867 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read - 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM 2606 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read - 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM 2753 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot. - 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM 2590 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote: - 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM 2921 Views
CoT, you mean (link to actual post included) - 28/05/2010 04:56:10 PM 2747 Views
Yep, I meant COT. *NM* - 28/05/2010 07:02:48 PM 1477 Views
Knife of Dreams - 18/06/2010 09:07:27 AM 2645 Views
Re: Knife of Dreams - 19/06/2010 05:49:38 AM 2721 Views
Agree... - 19/06/2010 05:08:44 PM 2634 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him - 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM 2733 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake - 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM 10223 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark? - 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM 2678 Views
Oh come on... - 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM 2705 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much... - 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM 2720 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice... - 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM 2733 Views
And your point is...? - 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM 2746 Views
Well... - 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM 2681 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble - 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM 2852 Views
There is no "borderline" about it. - 28/03/2011 05:17:15 PM 2520 Views
Ridiculous - 27/06/2010 06:38:46 AM 2579 Views
I like his FAQ and his overall musings on its' popularity. - 29/06/2010 06:35:10 PM 2603 Views
One year later... - 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM 2540 Views
Re: One year later... - 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM 2812 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes. - 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM 2772 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM* - 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM 1559 Views
Jealous? - 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM 2576 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM* - 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM 1463 Views
Seconded. - 30/03/2011 04:04:36 PM 2518 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM* - 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM 1588 Views
Yep! - 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM 2489 Views
Jeez Larry, you're starting to sound like a GRRM detractor. - 31/03/2011 03:01:38 PM 2689 Views
Nah, no detractor - 01/04/2011 03:00:41 PM 2681 Views
Could a thread be locked? - 31/03/2011 07:48:26 PM 2580 Views
Re: One year later... - 01/04/2011 02:55:02 AM 2997 Views
Yep - 01/04/2011 02:57:52 PM 2703 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM* - 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM 1485 Views

Reply to Message