Go back and re-read nigelgoboom's post, your response to it, then see if you can streach your leg back up onto that high horse.
You posted this troll-bait link and have proceeded to defend AR like he was your first cousin against anyone who didn't agree. I guess I self-appointed to be the one to counter your "points".
I am not going to coment on his blog and give him more traffic, I seriously doubt he actually wants real discussion.
Regardless of the accuracy of my spelling, I fail to see its relevance.
You posted this troll-bait link and have proceeded to defend AR like he was your first cousin against anyone who didn't agree. I guess I self-appointed to be the one to counter your "points".
I am not going to coment on his blog and give him more traffic, I seriously doubt he actually wants real discussion.
Regardless of the accuracy of my spelling, I fail to see its relevance.
As I said days (week?) ago, this is quite amusing. You get yourself worked up because someone has the audacity to disagree with your opinions on the issue? I know full well that the reviews aren't going to be accepted by all, but by some (which if you glance through quite a few of the posts here, you'll see that several acknowledge the validity of his points).
As for my "defense," I believe it's more a case of me having fun at your expense, I'm sorry to say. That's bad of me. I shouldn't indulge like that. But if you think this was "troll baiting," then why oh why did you keep responding? Did you need to vent? Or try to "convert" someone who doesn't take WoT to be anything more than a MOR fantasy to someone who wants to spend a lot of time analyzing it? What are your goals here?
The spelling bit was meant to mirror some of your claims that I considered to be non sequiturs.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
- 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
13459 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
- 20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
2754 Views
My problem with the reviews:
- 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
3397 Views
Hear Hear !!!
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1623 Views
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
- 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
1623 Views
well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
3070 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
- 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
2635 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
- 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
3052 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
- 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
2747 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
- 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
2796 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
- 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
2606 Views
My sister called me chicken once
- 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
2680 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
- 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
2690 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2624 Views
- 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
2624 Views
On a completely unrelated note...
- 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
2553 Views
Ha!
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2526 Views
- 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
2526 Views
My congratulations then
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2450 Views
. *NM*
- 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
2450 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2660 Views
- 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
2660 Views
There's a point to it?
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2647 Views
- 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
2647 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
- 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
1565 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2564 Views
- 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
2564 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
- 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
2558 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
- 24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
2610 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
- 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
2630 Views
pfft wth-ever
- 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
2436 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
2693 Views
bla bla bla
- 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
2598 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1740 Views
*NM*
- 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
1740 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
2544 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
- 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
2637 Views
I know you were, thus the
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2458 Views
at the least of my comment
- 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
2458 Views
Unimpressed
- 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
2934 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
- 30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
2940 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
- 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
2667 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
- 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
2481 Views
Awards
- 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
2435 Views
That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
2429 Views
Re: That link is out of date
- 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
2593 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
2459 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
- 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
2506 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
2511 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
- 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
2688 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
2439 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
- 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
2357 Views
No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
2429 Views
Re: No, no, no
- 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
2534 Views
Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
2475 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
- 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
2460 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
- 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
2691 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2400 Views
.
- 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
2400 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
- 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
2412 Views
Hah!
- 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
2412 Views
Well...
- 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
2336 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
- 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
2516 Views
I suppose
- 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
2434 Views
Re: I suppose
- 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
2590 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
2412 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
- 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
2597 Views
But why only them?
- 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
2501 Views
The Shadow Rising review
- 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
2700 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
- 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
11234 Views
That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
2704 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
- 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
2451 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
- 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
2557 Views
Little late to this one as well
- 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
2587 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
- 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
2676 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2492 Views
- 12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
2492 Views
What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
2663 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
- 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
2659 Views
See my comment below
- 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
2726 Views
Re: See my comment below
- 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
3061 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
- 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
2909 Views
Speaking of irritation
- 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
2614 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
- 09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
2527 Views
Commentary, then?
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2493 Views
- 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
2493 Views
Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
2448 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
- 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
2290 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2401 Views
- 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
2401 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
- 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
2627 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2677 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
2677 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
- 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
2540 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
- 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
2573 Views
You are very defensive over this
- 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
2362 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
- 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
2434 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
- 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
2600 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
2487 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
- 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
2348 Views
Which Invisible Man?
- 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
2550 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
- 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
2475 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2506 Views
- 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
2506 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
3031 Views
- 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
3031 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2513 Views
- 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
2513 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
- 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
2505 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
- 12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
2808 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
- 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
2481 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
- 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
2368 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
- 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
2461 Views
Well...
- 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
2573 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
- 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
2547 Views
Yes...
- 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
2269 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
- 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
2632 Views
I guess...
- 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
2610 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
- 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
3727 Views
Nah...
- 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
2286 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
- 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
2418 Views
Ah, well...
- 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
2336 Views
Dismissive, much?
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2525 Views
- 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
2525 Views
About that bifurcation...
- 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
2490 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
- 15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
2619 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
- 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
2488 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
- 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
2473 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
- 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
2353 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2289 Views
- 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
2289 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind...
- 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
2503 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
- 16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
2424 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
2537 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
- 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
2472 Views
I disagree
- 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
2304 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
- 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
2625 Views
Winter's Heart
- 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
2608 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
2453 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
- 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
2599 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
- 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
2435 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
- 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
2776 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
- 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
2589 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
- 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
10077 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
- 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
2508 Views
Oh come on...
- 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
2569 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
- 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
2579 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
- 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
2582 Views
And your point is...?
- 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
2605 Views
Well...
- 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
2536 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
- 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
2714 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
1424 Views
One year later...
- 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
2409 Views
Re: One year later...
- 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
2660 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
- 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
2633 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
1467 Views
Jealous?
- 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
2432 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
- 30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
2416 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
- 30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
2457 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
- 31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
2377 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
- 01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
2522 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
1377 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
- 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
1501 Views
Yep!
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2345 Views
- 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
2345 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
- 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
1391 Views

